Date: Thu, 9 Jan 1997 18:15:41 -0800 (PST)
From: LH Engelskirchen <lhengels-AT-igc.apc.org>
Subject: Re:  BHA: Re: idtd


Tobin --
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
 > Sorry, I can't follow you in converting the TD/ID distinction into a
 > material/conceptual and causal/noncausal distinction.  The transitive ideas
 > of science are still causally efficacious. 


I'm completely open on this, but not so fast -- I thought I learned 
perspectival from you.  If a thing is one thing, does that 
mean it can't be another?  With respect to referential detachment, that 
seems, under any account, not so.

Howard
----------------------------------------------------------------------------


     --- from list bhaskar-AT-lists.village.virginia.edu ---