Date: Wed, 12 Feb 1997 20:09:53 -0800 (PST)
From: LH Engelskirchen <lhengels-AT-igc.apc.org>
Subject: Re: BHA: great minds think alike


I am in favor of finishig the reading of RTS before we take on any 
other systematic reading!  RTS is a foundation.  And there is much much 
important stuff both in the chapter we are now working on and the next 
one.  "The Logic of Scientific Discovery," chapter 3, is essential for 
the concept of real definition, which is one of the things that 
characterizes critical realism and is likely to be most contestab 
(Ayeeah! Critical Realism is an essentialism!!)  It would be very 
helpful if everyone on the list would take a shot at the exposition, 
analysis or criticism of any small selection from the current reading 
so we can deal with it and move on.

Remember all the posted readings of RTS are avaialbe through the list 
if anyone has just tuned in.

Howard
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
 > From owner-bhaskar-AT-jefferson.village.Virginia.EDU  Wed Feb 12 11:56:17 1997
 > Date: Wed, 12 Feb 1997 12:59:57 -0600 (CST)
 > From: Erik P Weissengruber <weis0052-AT-gold.tc.umn.edu>
 > To: bhaskar-AT-jefferson.village.Virginia.EDU
 > Subject: Re: BHA: great minds think alike
 > Sender: owner-bhaskar-AT-jefferson.village.Virginia.EDU
 > Reply-To: bhaskar-AT-jefferson.village.Virginia.EDU
 >
 > I was wondering if there are plans to begin a systematic discussion of 
 > Dialectic.
 >
 > (Note: I tried to order to book from Verson, but got a book of the same 
 > title by Boris Kagarlitsky.  Good book, but not the one I wanted)
 >
 >
 >      --- from list bhaskar-AT-lists.village.virginia.edu ---
----------------------------------------------------------------------------


     --- from list bhaskar-AT-lists.village.virginia.edu ---