File spoon-archives/bhaskar.archive/bhaskar_1998/bhaskar.9801, message 10


Subject: Re: [MSPRINKER-AT-ccmail.sunysb.edu: Re: BHA: Re: test]
Date: Tue, 13 Jan 1998 09:25:21 +0000


My apologies to everyone on the list if they have had difficulties reading
some of my messages. Following Tobin's advice I have put the wordwrap on and
this should improve things. I use Eudora and as I type it automatically
wraps the words round as I type them so I just assumed that it would send
them in this format. anyway things should be better now. 

As for Michael's specific comments on Rorty/Bhaskar/Ree, I agree totally.
But it also seems to me that Ree is incorrect for another reason. Ree
basically argues that the problem with Rorty's anti-realism is that it's not
anti-realist enough. But Ree also says that the two anti-realisms cancel
each other out. My question is what's left if two anti-realisms cancel each
other out? A realism perhaps?

Thanks,



------------------------------------------------------------------

Colin Wight
Department of International Politics
University of Wales, Aberystwyth
Tel: (01970) 621769

----------------------------------------------------------------



     --- from list bhaskar-AT-lists.village.virginia.edu ---

   

Driftline Main Page

 

Display software: ArchTracker © Malgosia Askanas, 2000-2005