Date: Fri, 10 Apr 1998 21:58:49 +0200 From: bwanika <h961138-AT-stud.hoe.se> Subject: BHA: Re: aesthetics Hi everyone, I would have liked to hear Doug's in put on aesthetics in relation to elitist views. Now here is the problem . "Before thinking of an object , man according to Feuerebach , experiences its action on himself , contemplates and senses it. Could you imagine that the number of social workers an pyschologist greatly exceeds, the input by pensioners (> 60 yr) in society, let us say in matters concerning children upbringing and those with social problems. Life itself is an experience a whole department of study. Now, consider that drug abuse among children is expectionary ( ! ) an economic problem /factor rather than a dilemmatic life and how to live a life. The azande in their pre industrial structures use such for cattle abdominal effections! Michael writes how the Hamlet becomes incomprehensible to a given African tribe. This is very true . Can Colins then be wrong to imagine, the Azande are scared to death with this type of aesthetics. I read a report romatising such as our nature of being , goodness. Drugs! The opposite of development is envelopment and that is exactly how limited life in this part our world has become is. THIS IS A VERY SEROIUS MATTER. I remember Doug's protest agianst non existance of " free will ". The problem of epistemology should be resolved so that theory or theortical activities are correspondingly genuine human activities and experiences. I think you do Kant justice not live him out. On that note i can understand the terrible anger, which only lay claims on speculative illusion. Tobin I enjoy wines too, I surelly learnt enjoying them . Imagine my she thinks I am just spoilt, she hates wines! bwanika --- from list bhaskar-AT-lists.village.virginia.edu ---
Display software: ArchTracker © Malgosia Askanas, 2000-2005