Date: Wed, 14 Oct 1998 18:36:53 +0100
From: Mervyn Hartwig <mh-AT-jaspere.demon.co.uk>
Subject: Re: BHA: details on the T word


Hi Ruth, 

Ruth Groff <rgroff-AT-yorku.ca> writes
>Mervyn, I wondered if there was something in particular that you thought I,
>at any rate, hadn't properly appreciated about RB's theory of truth. (Apart
>from its rightness!) 
See my other posting on the list today.

>I agree with you that the most important thing is to
>understand a position before registering disagreement (although sometimes
>one learns by fussing...)
The royal road to science?

>, but it must be possible also to disagree with
>Bhaskar, or to suggest one reading over another, wouldn't you say? 
What reading? (My point was that there seems little evidence that
there's been much at all!)
-- 
Mervyn Hartwig
mh-AT-jaspere.demon.co.uk


     --- from list bhaskar-AT-lists.village.virginia.edu ---