Date: Mon, 01 Mar 1999 16:04:20 +1000
From: Gary MacLennan <g.maclennan-AT-qut.edu.au>
Subject: Re: BHA: on my " impatience "


At 09:37 PM 2/26/99 +0000, you wrote:
>Hi Gary.
>
>You wrote:
>>Now to conclude I wish Mervyn had not been rude to you.  I have written to
>>him to say that. And I am glad that he has subsequently smoothed things
>>over. With the exception of the unspeakable Ralph Dumain this has been a
>>polite list. We should do all we can to keep it that way.
>
>I take your point, and as I have said to Howard, mea culpa. My words
>were qualified by *it seems to me*, but even so not appropriate in the
>circumstances.
>
>However, I do not accept the status of black sheep after the unspeakable
>RD, as though no-one else has sinned. In the interest of peace and
>reconciliation I do not name names, but I will say that one particular
>kind of bad form I have encountered is, when I criticize a view, being
>accused of saying that the proponent of the view is stupid or
>insensitive.
>
>Mervyn
 

Peace Mervyn, (and Ruth too).

I would never classify your good self, Mervyn, along side Dumain.  Not
ever, besides you owe me a beer and I intend to collect.


Fellow list members.  


we are doing very well at the moment.  I am poised to get stuck into the
diffraction of the dialectic. (lucky me) 

If my post raises half as much discussion as Colin's  did I will be pleased.  

Repeat:- Everyone should be very well satisfied. We are getting through the
book and that is what it is all about.


regards

Gary

>
>     --- from list bhaskar-AT-lists.village.virginia.edu ---
>
>


     --- from list bhaskar-AT-lists.village.virginia.edu ---