Date: Sun, 18 Jul 1999 13:47:00 +1000
Subject: Re: BHA: Re: Diffraction Post one


At 2
>
>
>
>I have another question, but here I am getting ahead of
>Gary's summary of this Section, therefore I will
>send my answer to the list after Gary has sent his
>next installment:
>
>
>Q5: In what sense does Marx's critique of Hegel imply a
>critique of ontological monovalence?  Or maybe say it this
>way: RB claims that Hegel committed the error of ontological
>monovalence to a greater degree than Marx.  Give examples
>where Marx criticized Hegel for an error which in modern DCR
>language would be considered the consequence of ontological
>monovalence.
> 

Hi Hans,  

I am having computer problems so the second post will be delayed until
Monday.  There will I am afraid be a third post, later in the week.  


I think I can answer your question about the esoteric critique but I need
to get back home to do it.  It is open day here at Uni and I am in to give
"inspirational" talks to the young about their futures.

These study questions of yours are wonderful.  Please do not apologise at
all for them.


I will have a think about the ontological monovalence one and have a shot
at it as well. But I think we should note that Bhaskar insists that Marx's
dialectic is epistemological.  Therefore we would not expect it to touch so
much upon absence which is ontological. No?

regards

Gary

regards

Gary



     --- from list bhaskar-AT-lists.village.virginia.edu ---