Date: Sun, 1 Aug 1999 14:27:25 +0100
Subject: Re: BHA: 2.6


Ruth Groff <rgroff-AT-yorku.ca> writes
>Next, [Mervyn, can you see at *all* why someone might wish that this book
>had been a little better edited?!:)] 

Yes, Ruth, I can see, and indeed have indicated here several times that
I think the editing could be improved. I have also said that inadequate
editing doth not a bad writer make - but let's not revisit that!:)(:

I think you've produced a very useful summary. Thanks.
-- 
Mervyn Hartwig
mh-AT-jaspere.demon.co.uk


     --- from list bhaskar-AT-lists.village.virginia.edu ---