Date: Tue, 12 Sep 2000 19:43:58 +1000 From: Gary MacLennan <g.maclennan-AT-qut.edu.au> Subject: BHA: Post on Kierkegaard post 3a of 4 Dear Listers, This is the third of my posts on Kierkegaard. The initial impulse was that they were pieces that I could not get into my conference paper as it was way too long. My paper was about the relationship between Bhaskar's alethia and Heidegger's aletheia, or I suppose between the rational and the intuitive mediated through the aesthetic. I completed these posts before the Lancaster Conference but have been unable to get back to them until now. Hopefully some will find them of interest. Regards Gary 'The Arabians say that Abdul Khain, the mystic, and Abu Ali Seena the philosopher, conferred together; and, on parting, the philosopher said, "All that he sees, I know"; and the mystic said, " All that he knows, I see." (Emerson)' Before I comment on Kierkegaard's journal entry for July 29 1835 the thought has occurred to me about my methodology- specifically why these particular pieces? It would be easy, I believe, to answer in terms of the typicality of the excerpts I have chosen. I am convinced that in terms of Kierkegaard's work they are indeed typical. However the real reason for my choice is that in their romanticism the passages selected fit in with my own specific tastes and I suppose needs. Thus I prefer Schubert to Bach though I am prepared to concede that the latter is a greater musician. Still Schubert's Notturno strikes me as being truer to my lived experience than anything I have found so far in Bach. Though I am working on the violin concertos. The passage from K.'s journal raises the question of the ontological status of religious experience, especially of the mystical variety- a question that is of particular relevance at present for the Critical realist movement. For the rationalist, when we read this particular entry in K.'s journal we are in the presence of yet another 'traume eines geistersehers' as Kant remarked dismissively of the mystic, Swedenborg. Religious experiences, such as those of Swedenborg, are accorded little respect today and are generally explained away in terms of personality traits or dopamine flows. To be honest I am anxious to fudge things here, in a desperate effort to hold onto what is left of my reputation for sanity. But I do not think that such a compromise stance can be maintained for long. Last nite over dinner I raised the topic of this post. Emboldened and fortified by several very cheeky reds I said that I believed that when K. spoke of the dead coming to comfort him that they really came. My older son gave me a look, which seemed to say that I had betrayed the cause, and he asked caustically, "From where did they come, dad?" It is impossible to answer that really. Either one believes or one does not. --- from list bhaskar-AT-lists.village.virginia.edu ---
Display software: ArchTracker © Malgosia Askanas, 2000-2005