Date: Wed, 11 Oct 2000 00:11:13 +0100 From: Jan Straathof <janstr-AT-chan.nl> Subject: BHA: [fwd] World Government from: wsn-list <wsn-AT-csf.colorado.edu> by: <Arno.Tausch-AT-bmsg.gv.at> ...... Scenario (2) starts from the assumption, that anyway, Europe is not in a position to become a global challenger. Our scenario is a radical, socio-liberal, and globalistic approach, directed against nationalism, protectionism, and social decay. Instead of accumulating world power, Europe should accumulate competence in problem solving, in modeling the future, and in treating better the tormented environment. Thus, the enlarged European Union should concentrate it's still existing, considerable economic and world political energies on creating the conditions for global governance and global innovation. Thus, Europe at last would show a real greatness - foregoing the concept of power in benefit of the concept of global well-being and welfare. The scenario shares with the German Foreign Minister Joschka Fischer the vision of a fully democratic Europe, presented in his speech at the Humboldt-University in Berlin on May 12, 2000 (see for the official version, http://www.auswaertiges-amt.de/6_archiv/2/r/r000512a.htm). Of course, a European constitution is necessary, as well as a true European constitutional and administrative court, that would substitute and enlarge the present legal bodies. Our federal and socio-liberal vision is incompatible with the vision of a Europe of nations, which - in the ultimate instance - leads to the distribution coalition building at the level of the European institutions. A Europe of nations will always, in one way or the other, lead to a blockade of the European institutions - the small nations versus the big ones, the South against the North; the Euro ins against the Euro outs, the wine drinkers against the beer consumers, the friends of pasta and salami against the adherents of sausage and so on. The number of combinations is infinite, and a Europe of 21, let alone many more member states is simply ungovernable on the basis of the present institutions. Ideas of a 'small reform', with some shifting going on between the small and the large states, using endless number games in terms of commissioners, voting rights and what have you do not resolve the basic conflict and are simply idiotic: Parliament must be the locus of politics, and not the counting of the numbers behind the scenes, and trading - as before - measure x for support of measure y in coalition with z. Parliament must be strengthened, and there should be a second chamber of the European parliament as well - one 'House of Representatives' based on roughly equal electoral districts, with 1 million inhabitants electing 1 MP (for the smaller states with a population of less than 1 million, there must be an exception), and one 'upper house', a European Senate, giving each member country exactly 2 seats, irrespective of the population size of the country. To avoid the kind of distribution coalition building so typical for many European political systems, based on proportional representation, there should be at least a mixture of proportional and direct representation, based on the present German electoral model, if not an outright copy of the British electoral system altogether. By allowing for full-fledged democracy on the European level, combined with a socio-liberal social policy, based on a market economy, an active human capital formation, gender empowerment, an economic policy, that largely ends state subventions for energy misuse and private transport, and an open system of migration policy, generally modeled around the existing patterns of migration policy in countries like Australia, Canada, and the United States of America, there would be enough room for a real economic and social recovery on the level of the European states. It goes without saying, that the insane agricultural policy of the European Union and all forms of other protectionism must be ended, in favor of a large-scale policy of 'negative income taxation' and a basic social minimum, that at the same times abolishes most other forms of state intervention in the economy. The horrific indirect tax burdens, existing in Europe, must be ended in favor of a system of regressive direct taxation, that - on the other hand - is not too regressive, and would foresee a tax burden of around 35% for the top 20%, 25% for the next quintile, 15% for the middle income group, 10% for the next income group, and no taxes at the bottom and a negative income tax for the unemployed, Europe-wide. It goes without saying, that knowledge production and knowledge consumption should be fully opened to privatization, with the abolition of the state monopoly on Universities as the most urgent reform measure for the coming decade, and a full system of Universities on the market in place, as in the United States of America. The central European state would receive a limited amount of the financial resources, raised, with 7.5% of European government revenue concentrated in the center. This is very much above the present resources, but very much below the centralism of states like Belgium, that controll over 50% of the national economy. The 7.5% proportion should be fixed on a permanent basis. Since federalism is one of the most important preconditions of a successful long-term development strategy, the new European constitution would have to be approved by a European-wide referendum and the national parliaments. The establishment of a European democratic federal state would be the first and most important step in the direction of a socio-liberal world democracy, to be modeled pretty much on the same two-chamber pattern (with the UN General Assembly becoming the World Senate, with only two elected Senator from each state sitting in the World Senate). The executive organs of the United Nations become the world government, with the main agencies becoming the world ministries. The World House of Representatives could be modeled around the same pattern as the European House of Representatives, with 10 million inhabitants electing 1 representative; and in the smaller states, 1 representative from each country. Needless to say, that the same arguments that we used for the European case, should become valid on a world level. The world state should finance itself at the beginning by a symbolic flat 0.5% direct tax on all incomes, irrespective of their size. The highest tax level, that the world legislature could impose, would be 3% of incomes. I send this paragraph also to colleagues, working on the volume, and to friends and colleagues around the world - for comments. The most beautiful ones I will consider to include as a fully signed footnote in the article. It sort of continues a debate that Anton Pelinka and I had recently in the Café Landtmann in Vienna on global governance, a theme which is also dealt with in the magnificent Kimmo Kiljunen article for the volume. If you wish to receive the entire article, I can send it to you, but it is above 1 MB and contains many graphs etc. The summary is reprinted here: This paper starts from the assumption that there are two basic scenarios for the future of an enlarged European Union in the Tsunami world system. One is an enlarged EU that would be a global challenger, a scenario which would amount to the repetition of the cycles of global challenges, this time on the part of the European Union. Such a scenario might sound very distant at the moment, both culturally and politically, but it would correspond to the logic of world capitalism over the last 500 years, re-analyzed in this paper. Although such a scenario is not applicable to the present EU-15 or, at any rate, an EU-15, enlarged by the two island economies of Malta and Cyprus, and the present 10 Central and East European candidate countries, an EU comprising up to 40 nations of the third and fourth enlargement wave indeed would be a major change in the structure of the international system and could be driven by its own internal deficient dynamics, characterized by low innovation and high government spending, and by the pressures of the world system, into such a position. Again, the European landmass, united under one leadership, would then be in the challenging position, - as happened under the Hapsburgs, the French under Richelieu and later under Napoleon, and under Germany in World War I and II, while the dynamics of flexible, sea-power oriented world leadership again would be happening somewhere else. 13 hypotheses, presented here, speak in favor of such a pessimistic scenario. A large section of the paper is thus dedicated to show, that a global challenge option - which might be implicit in the thinking behind the trilateral competition between Europe, America, and Asia - is not only not feasible, but that it is world politically dangerous. A second scenario is the European Union as the driving force behind a movement towards global governance, the only and reasonable alternative to the workings of the capitalist world system and it's tendencies towards inequality and conflict. This scenario is the policy-option and practical end-result of the assessment of future trends in the world system, presented by Boswell and Chase-Dunn (2000). Although there is wide agreement in the literature on the need of a transition of the world system to a system of global governance (see Kiljunen, 2000, in this volume), the ways to achieve this are more or less a theme for speculation. In their world-systems-based analysis of the spiral of capitalism and socialism, Boswell and Chase-Dunn (1999) arrive at the conclusion that the European Union would be best fitted to become an engine of socially progressive transformation of the world system. Such an analysis would find lots of sympathy among labor-oriented or social-movement oriented circles on both sides of the Atlantic and beyond, and is also reflected in various other 'denominations' of the world systems profession, like in the statements by Samir Amin, who - although very critical of the Union in its present form - speaks about the necessity for Europe to become an alternative pole in the world economy, characterized by the tendencies towards unfettered globalization. Our first scenario is somber in nature, it enjoys a high kind of probability, and it has dire consequences. It shows that there is a recurrent, and shortening cycle of conflict in the international system, linked to the long cycles of economics and politics. According to Arrighi, the usual, recurrent slumps in the long, fifty year economic (Kondratieff) cycles are called signal crises; while the interaction between the end of hegemonies (1340, 1560, 1750 and 1930) and the regular Kondratieff slumps are called terminal crises or - Tsunami waves, because they have catastrophic and devastating effects on the world system and have a high probability of leading - in a shortening time period - to major power wars. Our analysis first shows, that the danger of such a more, but not too distant, Tsunami cataclysm after 2030 is real. First of all, the social consequences of the ongoing phase of globalization already have the character of a Tsunami wave in itself. This leads us to expect sharper and even deeper social effects, should a terminal crisis - like during the 1930s - hit the world economy again. The present phase of globalization is but the continuation of earlier globalization tendencies in the world system before the major power wars. Our analysis shows that the European Union repeats the errors of the import-substitution policies like those in Latin America in the late 1950s and early 1960s, so well known to dependencia theory, and becomes - like Brazil at that time - a technologically very dependent zone of the world economy. Europe is also facing the danger of repeating the fatal errors of the land-mass based attempts at world systems hegemony, like Venice, the Hapsburgs, France and Germany. The societal and economic contradictions of technological dependence and rent-seeking interact and increase, most probably leading towards a deepening of the unequal relations between the European center and the European periphery. Migration from the periphery to Europe, partially the result of these unequal exchange mechanisms with the European center, will increase the adaptation and globalization pressure on the European economy. Unlike America, whose economy is more open and thus adapts itself to migration much faster, Europe's structures are too inflexible and technologically dependent. The predicted downward cycle of the European position in the world system threatens to lead to a more assertive and authoritarian pattern of action vis-à-vis migration and vis-à-vis the other big trading blocs. The increasing societal role of corruption and organized crime as well as the lack of democracy within the European Union will increase, and not decrease with EU enlargement. Our assessment of the alternative that Europe could present in the transformation of the world towards a more humane and global governance should thus contribute to showing the dangers of a repetition of the hegemonial challenge scenario, that already was practiced by the Hapsburgs, by France and by Germany. A scenario, that was characterized each time by the combination of protectionism + imperialism. An imperial path for a United Europe would be the last thing, that the world needs, although there are - from past experiences - lots of indicators that would warn us, that Europe will follow precisely this path. Social science has the imperative to face up to existing dangers: thus, an early socio-liberal and democratizing reform of the European Union would be the (last) alternative to renewed global power rivalry, and conflict in the 21st Century, involving the European landmass. Kindest regards MR Univ. Doz. Dr. Arno Tausch Pr./D/13 - Federal Ministry of Social Security and Generations Department for Bilateral Relations and International Organization Stubenring 1 A-1010 Vienna Austria Phone: ++43 1 711 00-2272 or 6232 Fax: ++43 1 711 00-6591 electronic fax: ++43 1 718 9470 1350 http://www.bmsg.gv.at websites of possible interest: http://www.rferl.org/ Radio Free Europe/Radio Liberty. Gives access to RFE/RL daily newsline, special weekly reports like Balkan Report, Russian Federation Report, (Un)Civil Societies, Security Watch, Poland, Belarus & Ukraine Report; East European Perspectives, European Union Expands Eastwards, Weekday Magazine ... http://www.lib.berkeley.edu/GSSI/eu.html. European Union Server, UC Berkeley http://wiiwsv.wsr.ac.at/Countdown EU Enlargement Countdown, Vienna Institute for Int Ec Comparisons http://www.undp.org/hdro Human Development Report Office, UNDP: social reports from over 100 countries (window: National HDRs); analyses of global social policy; very recent social and health data from 174 countries http://www.worldbank.org/poverty/index.htm World Bank Poverty Net. Social Statistics and Analyses from around the world; links and search engine to/for social policy and health documents http://www.eurochild.gla.ac.uk/documents/monee/welcome.htm? UNICEF Transmonee data-bank Eastern Europe + CIS; statistical social and health policy country profiles http://www.bcemag.com/statistics/index.html Business Central Europe data-bank Eastern Europe + CIS http://www.monde-diplomatique.fr/ Le Monde Diplomatique. Current issues and full, free electronic archive with access to several years of LMD editions. German language edition under http://www.taz.de/tpl/.nf/home http://www.bbc.co.uk/search BBC World Service News search engine; free access to several months http://www.nzz.ch/books/nzzmonat/0/search Neue Zürcher Zeitung - search engine (one month archive) http://www.guardian.co.uk/ The Guardian (with search engine; one year archive) http://www.state.gov/www/outreach_publications.html United States Department of State - Outreach. Analytical reports from United States States Embassies around the world - free access to US informations on practically all countries of the world. Social policy and health are contained in 'Country Background Notes'; 'Country Reports on Human Rights Practices' (Chapters 4 ff: disabled, gender issues, labor issues etc.); 'International Narcotics Control Strategy Report'; 'International Religious Freedom Report' etc. http://csf.colorado.edu/wsystems/wsarch.html University of Colorado World-Systems Archive, editor: Chris Chase-Dunn, Department of Sociology, University of California at Riverside. Free access to documents on global social policy, inter alia the 'Journal of World Systems Research', to the 'Books - Web Documents' Series, to 'Working Papers' on global social policy etc. etc. --- from list bhaskar-AT-lists.village.virginia.edu ---
Display software: ArchTracker © Malgosia Askanas, 2000-2005