Date: Wed, 29 Nov 2000 16:42:22 -0500 From: lynne engelskirchen <lhengels-AT-igc.org> Subject: Re: BHA:reasons as causes Andrew -- Thanks. The Aristotelian stuff need not be of concern. What since the Renaissance we commonly think of as causality is pretty much Aristotle's efficient causality. With the beginning of the modern philosophy of science formal and final causes were ignored and material cause taken for granted so that left cause as efficient cause. So the question is whether reasons are a cause the way you normally think of cause. But if the question is a separate stratum which does have the kind of power you suggest, isn't that exactly contrary to Marx's Holy FAmily quote -- a distinct stratum of thought is impossible to separate out. Instead matter is the substratum of all change. And anyway what about Spinoza? Hasn't Marx just lifted this point from Spinoza? Howard --- from list bhaskar-AT-lists.village.virginia.edu ---
Display software: ArchTracker © Malgosia Askanas, 2000-2005