From: "Andrew Brown" <Andrew-AT-lubs.leeds.ac.uk> Date: Sat, 27 Jan 2001 13:34:20 -0000 Subject: Re: BHA: exciting threads! Ruth, You wrote (snipping mercilessly): > "To gain such perspectives without velleity or violence, entirely from > felt contact with its objects - this alone is the task of thought. > But it is also the utterly impossible thing... > To me, this passage sums up the fundamental difference between Adorno and > Bhaskar.... > This is at the heart of why I have always thought of Adorno as THE thinker > that one has to be able to deal with, if one is to defend Bhaskar's > thought from serious criticism... > But it doesn't sound as though any of those who have posted are much > bothered by what I see as such a profound difference between the two. If > this is so, and you're not much bothered, or you don't see any big divide, > would any of you guys mind helping me to see why? Well, I'm bothered! Bothered enough to reject the nonsense of a 'non-isomorphism' of thought and object in favour of an interpretation of Spinoza. But very few other people are bothered (whether critical realists or not). Hey ho. Andy --- from list bhaskar-AT-lists.village.virginia.edu ---
Display software: ArchTracker © Malgosia Askanas, 2000-2005