Date: Sat, 27 Jan 2001 22:00:57 -0500 (EST) From: Ruth Groff <rgroff-AT-yorku.ca> Subject: Re: BHA: what's next Hi Karl, all, As I said, I don't mind at all if people want to discuss Archer, though I won't be in a position to participate. But I'm a little surprised, Karl, by your post. I'm not clear why it would be "unnerving," as you put it, that the Bhaskar list would be focused on reading and discussing of Bhaskar's works. I don't think that there is any question that the list was founded for this purpose. (See the list address, the original project of reading of RTS, etc.) Clearly things have begun to evolve, such that a good 50% of people stating a preference would rather turn to Archer now. But I do think that the simple answer to your question is that, so far at least, this list has, in fact, been the Bhaskar list. (For what it's worth, I actually share some of the concerns that you raise. But I see them as logically unrelated to the merits of having a venue for to the discussion of a single thinker.) A little confused, Ruth --- from list bhaskar-AT-lists.village.virginia.edu ---
Display software: ArchTracker © Malgosia Askanas, 2000-2005