Date: Sat, 3 Feb 2001 01:02:18 +0100 From: Jan Straathof <janstr-AT-chan.nl> Subject: Re: BHA: Delivered up to the world Hi All, Martti kirjoitti: >That is the problem of idealisms inherently looming and lying >in negative dialectics. yes, the fantom of Idealism is indeed notorious in, not only Adorno's but, all kinds of modern (western) dialectics; and -in fact- one could argue that modern (western) dialectics is the main product (infant) of German Idealism; and Bhaskar imo, he too is constantly wrestling with idealist (i.e. anti-realist) tendencies/residues in and misconceptions of his own thinking, e.g. in mypost to Andrew a couple of days ago, regarding the switch from De to Ds, i proposed that his critique on ontological actualism was the main reason for this switch, but on second thoughts i would like to add that, because the ontological *Dr>Da>De* scheme in its original (RTS) exposition might lead to idealist misinterpretations (f.i. in the sense that one could charge that -in the end- the Dr is nothing other than some realm of transcendental *idealist/conceptual* identities or forms, let's say: a basic Platonism with a Kantian twist, hi Ruth), Bhaskar might have decided to change the term De to Ds, thereby explicitely marking the TR watershed between the Dr as an independent, non- actual and non-antropological, reality and the Ds as the zone fit and comprised by the empirical and conceptual powers of human ageny. yours, jan ps. i will leave the occultism thread, which seem to offend/irritate the intelligence of some people here, however i find the research on para- psychological phenomena from a CR perspective and methodology, still a very interesting erea, maybe i'll write something on that ;-) --- from list bhaskar-AT-lists.village.virginia.edu ---
Display software: ArchTracker © Malgosia Askanas, 2000-2005