Date: Mon, 26 Nov 2001 18:44:11 -0800 From: Ruth Groff <rgroff-AT-yorku.ca> Subject: RE: BHA: ontology, ontic, etc Hi Phil, You wrote: >Where is the dialectics here? To me, this approach seems to be about >qualifying and hopefully gradually improving and tinkering with Bhaskar's >ontology, overlooking the pressing problem about Bhaskar's epistemology. What approach? Whaddaya talking about? All I said was: "Here's what he's on about. Plus, it seems wrong when you think about the social sciences." [As for Adorno and Co., I actually had Horkheimer's "Traditional and Critical Theory" in mind when I added that one sentence in which I said that it seems wrong (for reasons that could certainly be described as dialectical).] Confused, r. --- from list bhaskar-AT-lists.village.virginia.edu ---
Display software: ArchTracker © Malgosia Askanas, 2000-2005