File spoon-archives/bhaskar.archive/bhaskar_2002/bhaskar.0201, message 115


Date: Sat, 26 Jan 2002 01:37:41 +0000
From: Mervyn Hartwig <mh-AT-jaspere.demon.co.uk>
Subject: Re: BHA: What scientists tell us


Dear Ruth,

Sure. No worries. Understood.

Mervyn


Ruth Groff <rgroff-AT-yorku.ca> writes
>Hi Mervyn
>
>Thanks for your response, esp for the axiology/alienation stuff.  It takes all 
>that I have to resist getting into a discussion over even the *definition* of 
>alethic truth, but I think I have to be strong!  Suffice it to say there's lots 
>that I WOULD say, if I didn't feel so pressed about staying focused on work at 
>the moment.  I seem to find more tensions in the development of Bhaskar's work 
>than you do, but perhaps we can agree to disagree, without actually doing all 
>the writing that would otherwise be involved in disagreeing?!  :)
>
>Sorry to drop the ball (though others may want to chime in),
>Warmly,
>Ruth  
>
>
>
>
>     --- from list bhaskar-AT-lists.village.virginia.edu ---

-- 
Mervyn Hartwig
Editor, Journal of Critical Realism (incorporating 'Alethia')
13 Spenser Road
Herne Hill
London SE24 ONS
United Kingdom
Tel: 020 7 737 2892
Email: <mh-AT-jaspere.demon.co.uk>

Subscription forms: 
http://www.criticalrealism.demon.co.uk/iacr/membership.html



     --- from list bhaskar-AT-lists.village.virginia.edu ---

   

Driftline Main Page

 

Display software: ArchTracker © Malgosia Askanas, 2000-2005