Date: Sat, 26 Jan 2002 01:37:41 +0000 From: Mervyn Hartwig <mh-AT-jaspere.demon.co.uk> Subject: Re: BHA: What scientists tell us Dear Ruth, Sure. No worries. Understood. Mervyn Ruth Groff <rgroff-AT-yorku.ca> writes >Hi Mervyn > >Thanks for your response, esp for the axiology/alienation stuff. It takes all >that I have to resist getting into a discussion over even the *definition* of >alethic truth, but I think I have to be strong! Suffice it to say there's lots >that I WOULD say, if I didn't feel so pressed about staying focused on work at >the moment. I seem to find more tensions in the development of Bhaskar's work >than you do, but perhaps we can agree to disagree, without actually doing all >the writing that would otherwise be involved in disagreeing?! :) > >Sorry to drop the ball (though others may want to chime in), >Warmly, >Ruth > > > > > --- from list bhaskar-AT-lists.village.virginia.edu --- -- Mervyn Hartwig Editor, Journal of Critical Realism (incorporating 'Alethia') 13 Spenser Road Herne Hill London SE24 ONS United Kingdom Tel: 020 7 737 2892 Email: <mh-AT-jaspere.demon.co.uk> Subscription forms: http://www.criticalrealism.demon.co.uk/iacr/membership.html --- from list bhaskar-AT-lists.village.virginia.edu ---
Display software: ArchTracker © Malgosia Askanas, 2000-2005