From: "Andrew Brown" <Andrew-AT-lubs.leeds.ac.uk>
Date: Fri, 8 Feb 2002 09:36:06 -0000
Subject: BHA: correction!


Hmmm,

I wrote:

> I think I am basically restating Collier's position here, though he 
> stresses all that is left in critical naturalism, viz. it's *philosophical* 
> aspects, whilst recognising the problem I stress, viz. that 
> Bhaskar's key discussion of *method* in social science has had its 
> apparent foundation (lack of ability to do social scientific 
> experiment) removed.
> 

This isn't quite right, so I suggest you ignore it! That'll teach me to 
email at stupid hours of the evening whilst trying to prepare a stats 
lecture!

The main points I made re transcendental deduction are correct, 
though.

Andy


     --- from list bhaskar-AT-lists.village.virginia.edu ---