Date: Wed, 15 May 2002 18:57:42 +0100 From: Mervyn Hartwig <mh-AT-jaspere.demon.co.uk> Subject: Re: BHA: Mainstream Philosophy of Science Hi Phil, Tobin, I took Tobin's comment to mean that Bhaskar's message, hence his audience, has been perceived to be Left. True. Why were you surprised, Phil, to find Bhaskar at a conference on scientific realism and theology, but not surprised to find yourself there? Doubtless Roy's attendance had to do with the fact that a leading Oxford theologian, Alister McGrath, has taken up critical realism in a big way. More details in the November JCR. Mervyn Phil Walden <phil-AT-pwalden.fsnet.co.uk> writes >Hi Tobin, > >Pressed for time but there is a short response below: >> >> >> A couple of other thoughts on the way CR and similar developments in >> mainstream philosophy seem not to know much about each other. I would >> hazard a guess that Bhaskar has been mainly interested in addressing the >> political left than mainstream philosophers. > >I would not say that I know Roy Bhaskar well. However, I do know him well >enough to know that he has spent very little time addressing the political >left. Instead I think Roy Bhaskar has spent a lot of time in philosophical >gatherings wrestling with recalcitrant problems bequeathed us by the history >of philosophy. I live in Oxford and I remember a few years ago going to a >small conference about "Scientific Realism and God" or some very similar >title. To my surprise who should be there but Roy, and as ever he was >getting in with a contribution on all the debates. In fact, as I remember >it, the Oxford-based philosophers virtually had to suppress Roy because he >had so much to say. If I can dig up my notes from that conference I might >try to post something on the list about it. (Not promising). > >Best regards, > >Phil > > (I don't know him >> personally -- those of you who do may want to speak to that.) To >> the extent >> that he *does* engage contemporary philosophers, which isn't much in any >> case, they're mostly people like Derrida who have been championed by >> progressives. Conversely, few mainstream philosophers are willing to have >> much truck with leftists (or maybe I should say, few *male* philosophers; >> anyway, a fair number of prominent female philosophers are >> somewhere on the >> left). >> >> But the problem occurs in other corners too. For example, Lakoff & >> Johnson's work comes awfully close to CR in many respects. But >> not only are >> they apparently unaware of CR, they also don't cite many of the mainstream >> philosophers toiling in these fields. And Johnson is himself a philosophy >> prof! Similarly, one might have expected the (left-leaning) >> contributors to >> a recent collection on identity and realism to be acquainted with CR, but >> with one partial exception, none of them are. Etc. >> >> Mostly, everyone seems to be in their own little cul-de-sac. One might >> describe this as specialization and an increasing division of intellectual >> labor. But whatever it is, clearly a lot of networking needs to be done. >> >> --- >> Tobin Nellhaus >> nellhaus-AT-mail.com >> "Faith requires us to be materialists without flinching": C.S. Peirce >> >> >> >> >> --- from list bhaskar-AT-lists.village.virginia.edu --- >> >> > > > > --- from list bhaskar-AT-lists.village.virginia.edu --- -- Mervyn Hartwig Editor, Journal of Critical Realism (incorporating 'Alethia') 13 Spenser Road Herne Hill London SE24 ONS United Kingdom Tel: 020 7 737 2892 Email: <mh-AT-jaspere.demon.co.uk> Subscription forms: http://www.criticalrealism.demon.co.uk/iacr/membership.html There is another world, but it is in this one. Paul Eluard --- from list bhaskar-AT-lists.village.virginia.edu ---
Display software: ArchTracker © Malgosia Askanas, 2000-2005