From: "Marshall Feldman" <marsh-AT-URI.EDU> Subject: BHA: RE: Note re: Howard re: Ronny Date: Thu, 16 May 2002 09:22:10 -0400 Hi all, Could someone provide references for Ellis' work? And Caroline Lierse? Also, I'm looking for a good summary of criticisms of positivism. I'm aware of many individual ones (by Bhaskar, Hacking, and others) as well as the classic "anti-positivist" work (Quine, Kuhn, Feyerabend) that attacks positivist principles. What I'm looking for is more of an overview and chronology. Does anyone out there know of one? Marsh Feldman > -----Original Message----- > From: owner-bhaskar-AT-lists.village.virginia.edu > [mailto:owner-bhaskar-AT-lists.village.virginia.edu]On Behalf Of Ruth Groff > Sent: Thursday, May 16, 2002 12:06 AM > To: bhaskar-AT-lists.village.virginia.edu > Subject: BHA: Note re: Howard re: Ronny > > > Hi Howard, > > I hope that Ronny will say more -- and I hope on-list, because > I'm interested in the Aristotelian underground too! - but I just > wanted to chime in for a second. > > The Harre and Madden book is not that widely engaged in establishment > >literature either, is it? > > My sense is that it registers on the radar both more and > differently than Bhaskar's books. > > > But actually, rather than the history of philosophy > >stuff, I'm more immediately interested in your impression of contemporary > >philosophers of science in their engagement with causal realism. Why has > >so little been made of the issue of ontological stratification? My guess > >is because mainstream realisms have emerged from the soil of Quine and > >Putnam. > > Can you say more about how Quine fits here? I would fit him into > the narrative very differently. > > > >Another way of asking this is how central has the critique of Hume > >been to the mainstream evolution of scientific realism? > > > Ellis and Caroline Lierse, at least, do go at Hume directly. Can > you say some more about exactly what you see being captured by > the term "ontological stratification" that you think is not > captured by those two, anyway? > > I think it would be great to do some common reading of some of the > >references you mention. > > I would love to do this. Absolutely. > > Ruth > > > > --- from list bhaskar-AT-lists.village.virginia.edu --- > --- from list bhaskar-AT-lists.village.virginia.edu ---
Display software: ArchTracker © Malgosia Askanas, 2000-2005