From: "dbwanika" <dbwanika-AT-uganda.co.ug> Subject: BHA: Philosophy & Social Practise Date: Thu, 19 Jun 2003 11:44:57 +0200 Listers! I have a few comments. With some practical political experience, I have noticed with dismay how extreme rationalisation of human affairs can be extremely fatal. Bhaskar has tried all his level best through the ID/TD, the social cube and the nexus of antagonistic ideology to eradicate social maliase brought about by the TINA formation if what is stated, below were to materialise in human societies. The object subject relationality is an array generating extreme rationalism i.e. standardisation. Sociologically I have come across the same struggle between “I” being and “society” being,a futile struggle I might add- when one does not take natural neccessisties (natural kinds- Ellis ) as a third array to complement the Bhaskarian model for social transformation where in fact that very problem seems to be finally resolved , OR. Realism Transcendental consciousness and communication: This one is interesting too to say the least! Husserl's noema. Can false consciousness be consciousness? Modern society the so called information society so to say is a conscious society. Can this be true or false? In my view, if one comes to terms with the level of communication our society is subjected to, and the resulting effects of such mediation, then may be we can locate subject object paradigm. I was discussing with a collegue in politics here and wondered why some decisions are taken as they are taken- I had no answer to the question but to my mind external forces can direct consciousness to false reality. And that reality can as well be true noematically! And if the state (civil workers & some politicans ideologically) assume they have an answer to ID as well as TD facts that becomes even more interesting an obsolutism generating the object subject dimension. However one factor is very clear that society collapses into passiveness. I will not generate empirical data to prove the case, i am also trying to see where we move from here. A collegue once asked; if you have 12 year old who has fallen substance abuse and the kid says wants this contrary to your views as a parent – what do you do ? I certainly had no answer for. Dealing with such issues has exposed me to the narrow confines of modern law but explaining what I knew using the same law, would even have complicated matters than not saying anything at all. Or did I know anything at all? On the other list- there was a debate on univeristy students and faculty protection vis á vis student freedoms – imagine student bulling of lectures for all reasons, their freedoms and rights to objectively resist harrasments from their lectrures, a some what interesting field of contestation. But more interesting to me today is how the entire field has emerged as developmental pyschology indeed political discourse and also defined in monetary terms adds to the acromonious noema! welcome to örebro, Sweden. Bwanika. ---------------- Besides, to be undifferentiated is not to be one; even in Platonic dialectics, unity requires divers items of which it is the unity. For those who live to see it, the new horror of separation will transfigure the old horror of chaos--both are ever-same. The fear of yawning meaninglessness makes one forget a fear which once upon a time was no less dreadful: that of the vengeful gods of which Epicurean materialism and the Christian "fear not" wanted to relieve mankind. The only way to accomplish this is through the subject. If it were liquidated rather than sublated in a higher form, the effect would be regression--not just of consciousness, but a regression to real barbarism. _________ bwanika url: www.idr.co.ug Logon & Join in ug-academicsdb discussion list http://www.coollist.com/subcribe.html List ID: ug-academicsdb Your Email address: ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ url: http://uhpl.uganda.co.ug http://pub59.ezboa --- from list bhaskar-AT-lists.village.virginia.edu ---
Display software: ArchTracker © Malgosia Askanas, 2000-2005