Date: Sun, 6 Jul 2003 08:14:20 +0100 From: "Goatcher, Jeffrey" <jeffrey.goatcher-AT-ntu.ac.uk> Subject: RE: BHA: moral world Thanks Jan for your help your comments have cleared up the moralISED aspect, whcih seems similar to Colliers idea of a transitve moral realm [in Being & Worth]. This would be the particular moraities [or amoralities] of current societies, but what of the intransitive morality? are we not also born into or with such a foundation? Cheers Jeff -----Original Message----- From: Jan Straathof [mailto:janstr-AT-chan.nl] Sent: Wed 02/07/2003 00:29 To: bhaskar-AT-lists.village.virginia.edu Cc: Subject: Re: BHA: moral world On 1 Jul 2003 19:40:18 <jeffrey.goatcher-AT-ntu.ac.uk> wrote: >Listers - a Lurker form the shadows [any old punks out there?] is confused >by DPF. Can anyone help me understnad how the world might be always >and already moralised or a-moralised? Hi Jeff, just some quick thoughts: I think what Bhaskar is trying to say is that, when we are born, we're always born in a world/society/family that is already moralised (or a-moralised); i.e. all those habits, codes, languages, practices etc. that pre-exist (and cf. TMSA co-create and co-change with [DPF:155]) a newborn human agent. Imagine e.g. a baby born, right now, somewhere in the suburbs of Baghdad or in a rural Swedish village. Besides geographics these are quite different moral contexts too i would say: nobody is born in an ethically neutral (non- moralised) world. What must the world be like for birth to be possible ? How must the world look like for babies yet to be born ? yours, Jan --- from list bhaskar-AT-lists.village.virginia.edu --- --- from list bhaskar-AT-lists.village.virginia.edu ---
Display software: ArchTracker © Malgosia Askanas, 2000-2005