From: "jamie morgan" <jamie-AT-morganj58.fsnet.co.uk> Subject: Re: Re[2]: BHA: Structures are not things that are true or false,even if Hegelian Marxists say so Date: Wed, 10 Dec 2003 15:51:21 -0000 Hardly, a rainbow has a different relation to its congition from the structured entuity than the linguistic notion of a mirage - cognition in a mirage places an object or subject into the environmental phenomena in quite a different way than sense data orders the ciolours of a spectrum fromt he basis of refraction through rain - without amind it is still refracted - but withoput a mind a mirage would not be a mirage it requires the interaction with mind to make it so there is a definite if subtle analytical diustinction ----- Original Message ----- From: "Günter Minnerup" <g.minnerup-AT-unsw.edu.au> To: "jamie morgan" <bhaskar-AT-lists.village.Virginia.EDU> Sent: Wednesday, December 10, 2003 2:04 PM Subject: Re[2]: BHA: Structures are not things that are true or false,even if Hegelian Marxists say so Dear jamie, on Wednesday, 10 December 2003, you wrote: > But it is not a mirage without a mind to make it so (mirage is an act of > experience based in the interpretation of an event that in turn is > structured) This is fun! So, by analogy, a rainbow is not a rainbow without a mind to make it so, but an experience based in an interpretation of an event that it in turn is structured? Congratulations, you win the pot of gold at the end of it... Regards, Günter -- Günter Minnerup School of History University of New South Wales Sydney NSW 2052 Tel. (+61 2) 9385 3668 (work) Tel. (+61 2) 9398 3646 (home) mailto:g.minnerup-AT-unsw.edu.au --- from list bhaskar-AT-lists.village.virginia.edu --- --- from list bhaskar-AT-lists.village.virginia.edu ---
Display software: ArchTracker © Malgosia Askanas, 2000-2005