File spoon-archives/bhaskar.archive/bhaskar_2003/bhaskar.0312, message 240


Date: Thu, 18 Dec 2003 09:18:28 +1100
Subject: Re[2]: BHA: Voloshinov etc


Dear Carrol,

on Thursday, 18 December 2003, you wrote:

> I've always thought it a mistake to try to "prove" realism. Since the
> anti-realist position is incoherent whenever it attempts to affirm
> anything, it can't be proven wrong.

I've never met a consistent anti-realist. They always hedge their bets at some point, like our friend Steve here who keeps saying that science is "primarily", "predominantly" etc an ideological activity. So what else is it besides ideological?

Regards,
GŁnter

-- 
GŁnter Minnerup
School of History
University of New South Wales
Sydney NSW 2052
Tel. (+61 2) 9385 3668 (work)
Tel. (+61 2) 9398 3646 (home)
mailto:g.minnerup-AT-unsw.edu.au



     --- from list bhaskar-AT-lists.village.virginia.edu ---

   

Driftline Main Page

 

Display software: ArchTracker © Malgosia Askanas, 2000-2005