Date: Sat, 2 Mar 1996 18:27:10 -0500
Subject: Re: MB: Heidegger


to A. Cools
One could disagree with your assertion that 1) there is such a continuity in
B's work; 2) on the meaning of revolution and on literture. B. seem to me as
trying to think the uncontainable and the rupture - what would it mean if his
philosophy developed in a way you suggest?  
How should one understand your project? How is it relevant for understanding
of B's thought?  (these are genuin questions not assertions)
Thanks 
Petar