Date: Thu, 19 Jun 1997 13:53:52 -0700
Subject: MB: A-voiding communications turn-st(y)le.


+ _______________________________(   )________________________________ -
				   |
				   |
	A "joining" already seams its way to happening, there, maybe 
within a "No one answered", sent, again from Moore, non the less, which 
found a frame, an impossible frame carved from what a void calls as its 
fore. 

	In what responded to that - which then questioned 
"knowledge['s]..gain[]" (Jenn), along with the problematic status of a 
"virgin would-be subscriber", (even though a Blanchot archive exists, and 
its fever can be accessed, revealing the "whore" for what its 
worth:(plenty)) - responded in turn, turning "by way of impossibility" a 
point in awl/all of every 'fores' directions (Irene), again, and through 
that we find more. 

	Communications crumbling walls that we scale. One can even taste 
the dirt, which falls upon our lips as we seek to tell of the disaster. 
Yet, there's Moore. Have you, Edward, traced the falling in/out which 
encircled this and the Bataille list (connected as they are)? The event 
itself - (and here I will point to surrealism via Blanchot) - showed how 
"...he had the particular power not of being the _one_ any more than the 
others, but of making surrealism each one's Other, and in the attraction 
of this Other taken as a living presence-absence (a _beyond the day_ at 
the horizon of a space unknown and without a beyond), of living it with 
friendship in the most rigorous sense of this exacting term: making the 
surrealist affirmation, in other words, a presence or a work of 
friendship." (Blanchot, _Infinite Conversation_, 408). What more.......?
				  |
				  |
	 Shall it be taken from there....? 
				   \
				    \
				     \Given again?
				     /
				    /
entre chien et loup dans ----------/
lalangue trespasses,               \
Lucio Angelo Privitello             \------------Then turn-st(y)le......