Date: Tue, 5 May 1998 01:38:21 +0200 (CEST)
From: janstr-AT-chan.nl (Jan Straathof)
Subject: Re: MB: LRD


William Flesch wrote:

>One way of saying perhaps why Blanchot isn't doing philosophy (except perhaps
>in the same way that Wittgenstein is doing phil) is to say that the history
>of phil is the history of the search for adequate truth claims, and that
>MB isn't looking for access to truth.


personally i think that it is "logic" (and its history) who is in search for
adequate truth claimes; philosophy imo is more about discovering
access-fields for ontological possibilities.

whether this leaves MB in- or outside philosophy is still questionable though

jan