Date: Fri, 23 Oct 1998 08:35:51 -0400 (EDT)
Subject: Re: MB: Literature and the Right to Death (clad t' be of swerve)



C. Allan Dinsmore wrote:

>Mmmmm: Sounds more like a surrealist group than a Blanchot group to me

Blanchot group space nontheless somehow engenders it. by the way what is
the relationship between Blanchot and Surrealism? zero? null? not even
cousins? also by the way is there a Surrealist group (or any other group
for that matter) that practises "it"? there seems not yet any official
place for it yet it emerges of its own nature and of the ur-nature of the
dimension into which it resonately manifests....ahhhh, the
buzzzzzzzzzzz.......

>... (but I like it immensely anyway)

thank you and/but of course (of chorus) I thank Clark for his
long-glyphingness through these spaces/times receptive to, and awakening
of, openings in spaces in spaces through the very letters that articulate
them...stars in the black night sky....
le stelle...the Stellas...all the Stellas....Clark, I thank you for always
beaming there. so abstract, so concrete, so beyond anything I could say, so
inviting of play, so inviting of the precious child, so Clark.


now back to the spaces sp aces s paces spa ce(lestial)s lest Ieye away me
lure (a tour) the gone from circuitries no knot tie undone so savour the
bursting flavour of blood so loosed that doesn't kill in the usual but
monster fusual like slay make way acknowledge through th' Rue top sigh t'
Ur-fee 'n' my tea cooling too vast



     curious void



 space ear quasi-blank

      (diversity (convection, voltage (potential difference) etc.))



...clad t' be of swerve...