Date: Thu, 04 Feb 1999 19:31:30 -0500
From: Russell Ford <russford-AT-hotmail.com>
Subject: Re: MB: Re:


I second this sentiment.  Let's read the Reader.

- russ ford

At 00:22 02/04/99 -0500, you wrote:
>So why don't we spill some fresh blood here?  Too many of the same old
>voices, beefing up footnotes and pressing on Heidegger.  Lets see what an
>unavowable community really looks like, and read some Blanchot. - cs
>
>At 10:40 PM 2/3/99 -0500, you wrote:
>> We tried this already Brian13, no go, dead air all around. Authority
>>abounds with barb wires crawling over the spacing space making it hard
>>to touch on truly cutting and stimulating matters such as the trembling
>>lips of chora--technology answering with ecstasy the barbs of
>>propositional discourse. Normative academics Brian13. You are better off,
>>if you still like the upward flow, to post more on the Bataille list or the
>>now new and improved Heidegger list. You seem interesting....
>>
>>Ariosto
>>
>>
>>> 
>>> i'd like to propose that we all read the station hill blanchot reader
>>> 
>>> "Blanchot's literary writings have commanded a cautious respect
>>> that seems almost unmatched in modern criticism; the works have
>>> been left alone." 
>>> 
>>> -Chris Fynsk, from the foreward.
>>> 
>>> 
>>> this listserv would get pretty interesting 
>>> after a dose of ..
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> ____________________________________________________________________
>>> More than just email--Get your FREE Netscape WebMail account today at
>http://home.netscape.com/netcenter/mail
>>> 
>>> 
>>
>>
>>
>>-- 
>>                               
>>        
>>
>>