Date: Fri, 12 Feb 1999 13:09:56 -0500 From: Reg Lilly <rlilly-AT-skidmore.edu> Subject: Re: MB: Holderlin quote Aim DeuelleLuski wrote: > > do u think Foucault realy paid "hommage" a blanchot? > did he undrerstood Blanchot as Blanchot understood him? > aim This is, I think, an interesting question. I'm one of those that think Blanchot's impact on Foucault's thinking has not yet been adequately explored -- it seems enormous to me. Foucault certainly seems to mean to pay hommage to Blanchot in his little piece. Blanchot's companion piece is really quite interesting; it wouldn't surprise me if Foucault was a bit disappointed by it. In any case, what has always strikes me about Foucault's reading of Blanchot is that he seems to 'purify' and 'essentialize' Blanchot in order to find a sort of pristine space of exteriority. One thing that seems missing in his reading of Blanchot is any sense of the work, the destiny of writing, and reading. Regards, Reg
Display software: ArchTracker © Malgosia Askanas, 2000-2005