Date: Sun, 16 Jun 96 12:09:33 EDT From: Elliot Weininger <PATBH-AT-CUNYVM.CUNY.EDU> Subject: Re: Info Request: Geneology of "Habitus" There's a well-known interview--whose location I've nonetheless managed to forget--in which, in addition to Weber and Elias, Bourdieu names Husserl, Hegel, and one of the medievals (Augustine?) as figures he had in mind when developing the concept of habitus. With respect to Husserl, the relevant text in which habitus and Habitualitat are developed is, in my view, _Experience and Judgment_ (and *not* the _Cartesian Meditations_). In _E+J_ these concepts are used to describe a certain regularity and "familiarity" which consciousness confers upon the world of experience *prior* to any explicit attempt to cognitively extrapolate it. This regularity is therefore *pre-reflective*. It operates by grouping objects together into a variety of "types" on the basis of their similarities and differences. These types, in turn, pre-determine how and what I will apprehend each time I encounter a new object of experience. Furthermore, the habitus effects this organization of the world on an *aesthetic*--rather than conceptual--basis. (Aesthetic, for Husserl, in the sense of "aisthesis," which is to say, perceptual.) Alluding to this aesthetic character, Husserl states that the habitus allows the world to exhibit a familiar "style." A few points which may be of interest: 1) for Husserl, the habitus has an explicitly *non-linguistic* structure. This means that the typifications which it contains do not take the form of predicative judgments--i.e the form "S is p". To the contrary, typifications are, as noted, formed according to perceptual criteria of similarity and contrast. Husserl expresses this by speaking of a "pre-predicative" component of experience. 2) Additionally, any explicit extrapolation of objects in the world--i.e. any predicative judgments that I render--have to begin from the regularities already established at the level of the habitus. However, they often modify, abstract from, or otherwise transform the world's pre-predicative order. This is particularly clear in the case of scientific judgments, which are formulated according to explicit rules of evidence that obviously don't apply at the level of habitus. (It is for this reason that phenomenologists often speak of the world of habitual typicalities as that of a "pre-scientific" nature.) 3) Lastly, it should be noted that this pre- predicative level of experience comprises one of the (many) meanings that Husserl gave to his well-known term "lifeworld." I hope this little disquisition is of interest. It seems to me that what probably appealed to Bourdieu was Husserl's notion of an underlying experiental regularity which is both pre-reflective and non-linguistic. (Interestingly, Husserl is clear that only predicative judgments are routinely open to thematization and criticism; the strucutres of the habitus, by contrast, can only be laid bare by means of a complicated philosophical technique capable of breaking with the presuppositions of everyday and even scientific thought.) Of course Bourdieu, who tries to restrain his philosophical impulses, is primarily interested in how particular institutional arrangements or particular cultural configurations evince a particular habitus. Husserl, to the contrary, was interested in the invariant structures of the habitus as such. The one time he took an even slightly sociological approach was in his late study _The Crisis of the European Sciences_. This text, in my opinion, can be read as an attempt to analyze (and thereby help dispel) the way in which the culture of modern science has quietly reshaped the contemporary European habitus. (Phenomenology is thereby supposed to have an extra-philosophical significance.) Elliot Weininger Dept. of Sociology CUNY Graduate Center ********************************************************************** Contributions: bourdieu-AT-lists.village.virginia.edu Commands: majordomo-AT-lists.village.virginia.edu Requests: bourdieu-approval-AT-lists.village.virginia.edu
Display software: ArchTracker © Malgosia Askanas, 2000-2005