Date: Wed, 23 Sep 1998 11:26:19 +0200
From: Kent Lofgren <Kent.Lofgren-AT-pedag.umu.se>
Subject: RE: Sociology or epistemology?And games.


>that games are truly bounded but thinking of them as games implies
>boundary.

You mean like, for instance, chess has a couple of defined outcomes (Win,
loss, draw etc.)? Whereas we in life have un-limited numbers of possible
outcomes.

Kent

Dept. of Education
Ume=E5 University
S-901 87 Umea
SWEDEN


**********************************************************************
Contributions: bourdieu-AT-lists.village.virginia.edu
Commands: majordomo-AT-lists.village.virginia.edu
Requests: bourdieu-approval-AT-lists.village.virginia.edu