Date: Fri, 26 Feb 99 11:19:49 -0300
From: pibar <pibar-AT-indec.mecon.ar>
Subject: RE: algunas aclaraciones


Leonel:
Me atrevo a escribirte en castellano.
Espero que Bourdieu no te quite tanto el sue=F1o.
Las concepciones de Bourdieu son complejas pero no inaccesibles.
El concepto de habitus como estructura estructurante y estructurada de las 
practicas sociales, permite explicar de alguna manera las relaciones de 
dominaci=F3n.
Es decir, existen en las relaciones de la cotidianeidad, en los vinculos en el 
uso del lenguaje, una replicaci=F3n de las relaciones de sominaci=F3n en forma 
sutil y, me atraveria decirte, inconciente. 
Hay ejemplos concreto en los circuitos del uso de la lengua, en la relacion 
entre docente alumno pero ademas no brinda una mirada pesimista ya que arroja 
una luz sobre el cambio de ese habitus.
Creo que estas en el camino correcto, como decimos en Argentina, le estas 
cazando la onda.
Para cualquier cosa, a tus ordenes

Pilar Barrientos
Buenos Aires Argentina
pilarbarrientos-AT-hotmail.com
ICQ 30405267
>Im Leonel G=F3mez, student in the ITESO university in México.
>I have a question that trouble my sleep at night.
>The concepts of Habitus, field, Structure in Bourdieu theories implies a
>specific sociological point of view. To see relations instead of
>persons, to see structures instead of subjects doing something, to see a
>dinamic process between Social structures-Habitus-Practices to explain a
>subject behavior instead of seeing a subject doing action guided by a
>free will. To think in a power relationship between dominants and
>dominateds to understand a subject interactions with other subjects.
>My first question is =BFdo i get it?=BFam i understandig the basic logic of
>the theory of Bourdieu?
>
>Another one. I read all the material i can get about Bourdieu theories,
>but i am not sure to understand the concepts correctly.
>For instance, there is a document made by Bourdieu about the aplicaction
>of the theorie of fields in the fashion world, Bourdieu describe the
>features of the dominants and dominated. I.e: dominants use more
>structured sentences, use strategies to preserve power etc.
>If i do the same, describe the features of the dominants and dominated,
>describe the strategies used by boot and describe the total fighting for
>power in the field, is it the correct use of Bourdieu theorie.
>
>I hope you understand my english and that i was clear enough, and that
>somebody could answer and so get my sleep back.
>thanks.
>
>______________________________________________________
>Get Your Private, Free Email at http://www.hotmail.com
>**********************************************************************
>Contributions: bourdieu-AT-lists.village.virginia.edu
>Commands: majordomo-AT-lists.village.virginia.edu
>Requests: bourdieu-approval-AT-lists.village.virginia.edu


**********************************************************************
Contributions: bourdieu-AT-lists.village.virginia.edu
Commands: majordomo-AT-lists.village.virginia.edu
Requests: bourdieu-approval-AT-lists.village.virginia.edu