From: S.Pines-Martin-AT-iaea.org Subject: RE: plurilinguism (yawn) Date: Wed, 31 Mar 1999 14:23:47 +0200 I will agree with Grethe: >"I think everybody have made themselves clear >on the use of various languages on this list now. >Let's move on." but ...still, and sorry, I said some pretty crappy things, so I would like to make my own last comment (funny how this topic really touches something deep inside us...), by answering Emilio who distinguishes: a) The degree and the quality of knowlegde that many of us, spanish speakers sociologists, we have about contemporary sociological theory, (not only about Bourdieu but about Giddens, Elias, Pizzorno, Touraine, Boudon, Coleman, and so on.....). In other terms....our interests like sociologists are are far away of only say this stupid sentence: "how exciting it would be to talk about Bourdieu in Spanish" ..... I find this sentence a bit offensive.... Not only Spanish speakers. In anthropology (which I merely study) I find the problem is all the more acute because of its subject matter: there are excellent anthropologists in the so-called Third World who are hardly ever heard, and not merely because of the language, but because of the the economic and political structures that determine what is and what is not actual, of interest, what is published, heard, which institutions have weight and prestige and which do not. I have no intention of denigrating Spanish speaking social scientists (I am from Spain myself and I am apalled by the difficulties we have in the social sciences there with funding, support, and I admire the tenacity of its practitioners); but I *am* touchy about national/linguistic prides, perhaps because I am one of those "sociological bastard beings" (as Bourdieu says somewhere) who don't exactly fit any clear category, as my social history has deprived me of a univocal sense of national identity (no loss but also no gain). Hence I totally disagree with any attempt to censor anyone's participation in other languages, but I am also very cynical about exalting one's own. The remark "how exciting it would be to talk about Bourdieu in Spanish" is extremely stupid and it was *meant* to be offensive, but as a revulsive. *My* reaction (not towards anyone in particular, but towards an attitude I "intuited", wrongly perhaps) to a first series of emails that *did* only express excitement about discussing these things in Spanish was: "speak whatever you like [and Spanish truly is a very widespread language] but just stop beating around the bush". Despite all posterior clarifications, it still seems obvious to me that problems of power and hegemony were being addressed in a very indirect way (and "directly" speaking of English as a language of domination, which it also is, can be a way of giving free reign to some unreflected impulses and of expressing them very indirectly); I had the impression that despite individuals' good will in their "drive to expression" within the "censure of the field" (this predominantly English-spoken field of Bourdieu postings), they were "acting out", so to say, some semi-conscious impulses. But I am no scholar: I was assuming things on the basis of highly personal, subjective experiences, without the slightest "scientific sublimation". But what *is* this "censure"? Is there one, really, i.e., inherent to this forum? Or isn't it rather internalized here and there by certain individuals in certain social fields, through education, social position, national identities and their relations to wider international relations, etc., all of which is then projected and introjected...? All these projections spill out like fireworks and we have a spectacle of sociological interest --and a very touchy one indeed! This is what I felt was worthy of discussion. b) The capacity to interact in english in this very usefull list. ...We (the spanish, french or italian...speakers sociologists) can learn a lot reading some very intelligents contributions and participating even in a marginal and ocasional way, even in spanish, french or in my very "italian or spanish" english. .... And you see, here it is again: why should anyone feel, in any way whatsoever, conditioned to contribute in a *marginal* way? I would still love to hear more from Spanish speaking sociologists, that is the truth. The spectre of marginalisation haunts me too --not because of language, but because I do not have the privilege of the sociologist --time and resources--, and so my "contributions" (if they are not rather a pain in the ass) are drenched in a self-conscious marginality that I try to overcome (due, among other reasons, to Bourdieu himself, who so vehemently protests that unlike in other scientific fields, say chemistry or physics, where nobody would think of spontaneously offering his or her opinions, in social science any and everyone believes him/herself a prodigy of insight, lucidity, imagination and wisdom). But I will agree with Grethe: "Let's move on." I have some comments down my sleeve which I would love to send, but the thought of doing so just robs me of my sleep. It's just a thought I had concerning the "psycho-social dynamics of hate", as I call it, and in which I ask whether it would make any sense to treat hate as a social good (sorry for the evil sounding pun) with which we traffic, something on which certain individuals can capitalize, indeed as an extremely weird, irrational, though very commonplace form of "capital" (the idea, which came to me last night, stems from my recollections of personal experiences in certain social fields where individuals (patriarchs, bosses at work, supervisors, generals, lieutenants and sargents, etc.) wield their dominant positions to produce hate in others and thereby "possess" them and enhance their capacity for mobilising social energies, wills, affects). Would anyone be interested in hearing about it? It's anything but scientific, but... Oh well, I try hard. Y bueno, a lo mejor me da por ahí y lo envío en castellano para ver qué tal suena y si hay respuesta de alguien que tenga esos conocimientos que yo no tengo ... Sin problemas. Grüsse an euch alle, Sergio ********************************************************************** Contributions: bourdieu-AT-lists.village.virginia.edu Commands: majordomo-AT-lists.village.virginia.edu Requests: bourdieu-approval-AT-lists.village.virginia.edu
Display software: ArchTracker © Malgosia Askanas, 2000-2005