Date: Wed, 12 May 1999 10:13:26 +0100 From: Kent Lofgren <Kent.Lofgren-AT-pedag.umu.se> Subject: Pink Floyd, subjectivity/objectivity I have hidden titles for Pink Floyd songs in the following text. How many can you find? Please give your answers to me direct ("kent.lofgren-AT-pedag.umu.se") and not to the Bourdieu-list. There is no price, just the glory. ----- One of the dilemmas, for me, is how to combine a study of opinions (phenomenology) with a study of objective structures. This dilemma is perhaps neither hard to solve, nor a cause for great sorrow, if one possesses ideas on methodology and are fairly experiences as a researcher. If you have any ideas how to combine study of opinions with a study of objective structures, then I wish you were here, on the list, to tell me how. My query is perhaps "outside" the topics discussed on the list, who knows? If this is so, and my topic is "wrong", I'd perhaps better run like hell out of here! However, I argue that opinions are expressed with words and phrases using concepts and terms and these concepts are created prior to the individual. He/she is using pre-constructed concepts to express opinions. Now, these opinions are sometimes of a certain kind in certain social settings (contexts) and there are possibly additional kinds of opinions in other social settings. (In one group it might be o.k. to say that "the delicate sound of thunder is a beautiful sound", whereas this is impossible to say in another group.) So, in other words, the context influences opinions. If we want to know more about the social world, we should perhaps combine a study of opinions with a study of context (Let it be material, symbolic assets or whatever)? What I am saying is that there are different perspectives (methodologies) and we as researchers should strive to combine different ways of do research to better understand our world. If we settle with just one perspective, and never use other ways of interpreting the world, we might be comfortable numb but that comfort is false. ----- Good luck Kent "That's a very non-academic topic" Lofgren Dept. of Education Ume=E5 University S-901 87 Umea SWEDEN ********************************************************************** Contributions: bourdieu-AT-lists.village.virginia.edu Commands: majordomo-AT-lists.village.virginia.edu Requests: bourdieu-approval-AT-lists.village.virginia.edu
Display software: ArchTracker © Malgosia Askanas, 2000-2005