From: "yitshac" <yitshac-AT-post.tau.ac.il>
Subject: Re: List Protocol
Date: Tue, 9 Nov 1999 11:06:08 +0200


One could suggest a split of the list, like in a military contingent:
private dining room, NCO dining room, and the best one with the best served
food for officers. Or to use Lacanian to describe this kind of grudge: "Who
is enjoying?" asks the obsessive.

----- Original Message -----
From: Brandon Claycomb <BRANDONCLAYCOMB-AT-email.msn.com>
To: <bourdieu-AT-lists.village.virginia.edu>
Sent: יום רביעי 10 נובמבר 1999 10:27
Subject: Re: List Protocol


> Kent Strock wrote:
> >if someone wants to ask, "what primary texts should I read to understand
> >Bourdieu" then this opens possibilities for discussion...other than that
go
> >to a library or the bourdieu on-line bibligraphy.
>
>
> I simply don't see what it hurts for any sort of discussion of Bourdieu to
> occur on this list, whatever its level. At most I could see that perhaps
the
> very basic questions grow wearisome for the more experienced list members.
> But since this is an email list there is the very simple solution to this
of
> simply deleting the offending posts. That to me seems preferable to trying
> to run people off the list.
>
> All of which seems quite separate to me from the fact (with which I agree)
> that anyone interested in Bourdieu would do well to read as much Bourdieu
as
> they can.
>
>
>
> **********************************************************************
> Contributions: bourdieu-AT-lists.village.virginia.edu
> Commands: majordomo-AT-lists.village.virginia.edu
> Requests: bourdieu-approval-AT-lists.village.virginia.edu
>

**********************************************************************
Contributions: bourdieu-AT-lists.village.virginia.edu
Commands: majordomo-AT-lists.village.virginia.edu
Requests: bourdieu-approval-AT-lists.village.virginia.edu