From: "kent strock" <sigmund5-AT-hotmail.com> Subject: Re: habitus Date: Tue, 07 Dec 1999 10:03:47 PST thanks Karl and sorry for any misunderstandings >From: Karl Maton <karl.maton-AT-dtn.ntl.com> >Reply-To: bourdieu-AT-lists.village.virginia.edu >To: bourdieu-AT-lists.village.virginia.edu >Subject: Re: habitus >Date: Tue, 07 Dec 1999 17:26:05 +0100 > >Kent, watch out there's another Kent on the listserv. The email below >was addressing his email, not yours. > >kent strock wrote: > > > > S. Pines-Martin, > > I don't remember writing what you attribute to me. A basic question >would be > > how do you see concepts becoming reified? > > thanks, > > kent > > >Kent, aren't you merely reifying the abstract > > >categories that are used in theoretical discussions? (especially where >you > > >say "is thereby *something* else (than habitus)") > > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > > From: Kloss [SMTP:kloss-AT-erie.net] > > > > Sent: Tuesday, 07. December 1999 14:40 > > > > To: bourdieu-AT-lists.village.virginia.edu > > > > Subject: Re: habitus > > > > > > > > The way I understand Bourdieu leads me to suggest that you > > > > may be setting up a classical, dichotomous approach which Bourdieu >wants > > > > to > > > > avoid ( there is no "absolute," transcendental, "rationality" that >the > > > > subject has access to or is, as, let's say- opposed to habitus). >There > > >is > > > > always the temptation of reification of such an historical >construction > > >of > > > > rationality and I feel Bourdieu would suggest that we might want to > > > > reflect > > > > upon our philosophical/lexical habitus a la the later Wittgenstein. > > > > > > > > Joe Kloss, > > > > Erie, Pa. > > > > > > > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > > From: Kent Lofgren <Kent.Lofgren-AT-pedag.umu.se> > > > > To: bourdieu-AT-lists.village.virginia.edu > > > > <bourdieu-AT-lists.village.virginia.edu> > > > > Date: Tuesday, December 07, 1999 5:49 AM > > > > Subject: habitus > > > > > > > > > > > > >Hi, I have a question about habitus. The question is based on some > > > > >interesting discussion I had w. my friend and colleague Mattias > > >Johnsson. > > > > >the question builds on some premisses. They are: Bourdieu argues >that > > > > >habitus deals with sort of the everyday situations and is sort of >an > > > > >automatic reaction to things that happen around the individual. >O.k.? > > > > (This > > > > >is in a very simple and straight forward language). Also (second > > > > premiss): > > > > >the rational calculating/thinking (by an individual) is thereby > > >something > > > > >else (than habitus). > > > > >Our question then, is: Where are B discussing the >relation/distinction > > > > >between social habitus and rational and consious calculating? Any > > >recent > > > > >sources/articles? We have read material from mid 1980's. > > > > >Also, if you have any comments regarding this relation/distinction, > > > > please > > > > >share them with us. > > > > > > > > > >O.k.? Hope you all understood our query. Feel free to respond >directly > > >to > > > > >me, if you want to. > > > > > > > > > >Sincerely > > > > > > > > > >Kent Lofgren > > > > >Graduate student/teacher > > > > > > > > > >Dept. of Education > > > > >Umea University > > > > >S-901 87 Umea > > > > >SWEDEN > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >********************************************************************** > > > > >Contributions: bourdieu-AT-lists.village.virginia.edu > > > > >Commands: majordomo-AT-lists.village.virginia.edu > > > > >Requests: bourdieu-approval-AT-lists.village.virginia.edu > > > > > > > > > > > > > >********************************************************************** > > > > Contributions: bourdieu-AT-lists.village.virginia.edu > > > > Commands: majordomo-AT-lists.village.virginia.edu > > > > Requests: bourdieu-approval-AT-lists.village.virginia.edu > > >********************************************************************** > > >Contributions: bourdieu-AT-lists.village.virginia.edu > > >Commands: majordomo-AT-lists.village.virginia.edu > > >Requests: bourdieu-approval-AT-lists.village.virginia.edu > > > > > > > ______________________________________________________ > > Get Your Private, Free Email at http://www.hotmail.com > > ********************************************************************** > > Contributions: bourdieu-AT-lists.village.virginia.edu > > Commands: majordomo-AT-lists.village.virginia.edu > > Requests: bourdieu-approval-AT-lists.village.virginia.edu > >-- >With best wishes, > >Karl > >Karl Maton >School of Education, University of Cambridge > >Correspondence address: >108 Avenue Road Extension, Leicester LE2 3EH >Tel: 0116 220 1066 >Email: karl.maton-AT-dtn.ntl.com > >I am certain of nothing but the holiness of the hearts affections and >the truth of the imagination >Keats >********************************************************************** >Contributions: bourdieu-AT-lists.village.virginia.edu >Commands: majordomo-AT-lists.village.virginia.edu >Requests: bourdieu-approval-AT-lists.village.virginia.edu > ______________________________________________________ Get Your Private, Free Email at http://www.hotmail.com ********************************************************************** Contributions: bourdieu-AT-lists.village.virginia.edu Commands: majordomo-AT-lists.village.virginia.edu Requests: bourdieu-approval-AT-lists.village.virginia.edu
Display software: ArchTracker © Malgosia Askanas, 2000-2005