Subject: Re: Crucial Questions on Life: some sanity Date: Sat, 03 Nov 2001 06:19:02 Amazing post that clarifies what depression is outside of academic "productive" work towards tenure! >From: Anthony White <anthony.white-AT-paradise.net.nz> >Reply-To: bourdieu-AT-lists.village.virginia.edu >To: bourdieu-AT-lists.village.virginia.edu >Subject: Re: Crucial Questions on Life >Date: Sat, 3 Nov 2001 12:41:07 +1300 > >Alev, > >[cross posting to Deleuze-Guattari list, as it could be interesting there >...] > >Going even further off topic, but it seems necessary in order to think of >these problems with clarity. > >Prozac, and other antidepressant medications, don't cause 'happiness'. >They create an absence of depression. Depression is not sadness, or >grief, or sorrow. Anti-depressants do not remove sadness or grief or >sorrow. > >Depression stops one's ability to feel happiness, but it can also stop >one's ability to feel sadness, or grief; one's mind still works -- you can >think effectively -- but there is no desire to eat, no pleasure in sleep, >no appreciation of comfort; you realise that something is probably funny, >but can't bring yourself to laugh at it, or that something is sad, but >can't bring yourself to be moved by it; there's no satisfaction in going to >the gym, or running for an hour, or walking along the waterfront; no >appetite for sex, and if you do it's purely mechanical; music's just some >noise that comes from somewhere, friends are just objects that move through >your space ... > >Depression often feels just like being removed from your body, like you've >stepped out the back door of your own head, and are watching it, but can't >be touched by it, and don't really care what happens to it. To get >Deluezian for a moment, it's a complete absence of affect, an inability to >experience affect. It's really awful. It's frightening just how much one >doesn't care about one's self. > >Regards, >Anthony. > > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: AlevAdil01-AT-aol.com > To: bourdieu-AT-lists.village.virginia.edu > Sent: Friday, November 02, 2001 12:27 AM > Subject: Re: Crucial Questions on Life > > > when i first read Berk's mesage I was bemused, not because >mind/body/brain questions are frivolous but because I didn't se their >relevance, to Bourdieu. However the liveliness of responses and the >reactivation of the list meant that even if irrelevant to Bourdieu it >invigorated the list nevertheless. The comment on the irrelevance of the >question in general that saw the mind/brain question as academic self >induglence was mind boggling dumb as was the idea that if we really cared >about this then there might be world peace. You might find attempts to >delineate experience and phenomena, the 'real' and identity, selfindulgent >but multinationals like Hoffman-LaRoche do not. Brain mapping and >delineating (whether there is) a difference between brain (organism) and >mind (experience) is central to pharmaceutical profits and psychiatry - >prozac any one? does serotonin=happiness? does unhappiness lead to a >serotonin drop or is it caused by it? the future of cyberbrain modification >etc is born also at the philosophy/technology interface. > > Alev _________________________________________________________________ Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com/intl.asp ********************************************************************** Contributions: bourdieu-AT-lists.village.virginia.edu Commands: majordomo-AT-lists.village.virginia.edu Requests: bourdieu-approval-AT-lists.village.virginia.edu
Display software: ArchTracker © Malgosia Askanas, 2000-2005