From: "Pam Stello" <stello-AT-socrates.berkeley.edu>
Subject: Re: online bourdieu study group
Date: Wed, 30 Apr 2003 21:37:48 -0700


This is a multi-part message in MIME format.


If there are no objections to opening up this list to a more basic discussion of Bourdieu, that would work well. I suggested starting a new list b/c I thought a discussion for beginners might be well beyond the intended use of the list.

Pam
  ----- Original Message -----
  From: David C. Bartecchi
  To: bourdieu-AT-lists.village.virginia.edu
  Sent: Wednesday, April 30, 2003 8:56 PM
  Subject: Re: online bourdieu study group


  Why not just use this list? It would be a shame to start a new list and then have everyone on this list migrate to it.

  However, I am relatively new here (~ 6 months) and don't know its intended purpose and scope but I do know that it has been relatively inactive since I've been on it. What do some of it's early members (or moderator) feel about opening it up to a more basic discussion of Bourdieu? Or is better to start another list?

  David Bartecchi






-----
  Do you Yahoo!?
  The New Yahoo! Search - Faster. Easier. Bingo.

HTML VERSION:

----- Original Message -----

From: David C. Bartecchi

To: bourdieu-AT-lists.village.virginia.edu

Sent: Wednesday, April 30, 2003 8:56 PM

Subject: Re: online bourdieu study group

Why not just use this list? It would be a shame to start a new list and then have everyone on this list migrate to it.

However, I am relatively new here (~ 6 months) and don't know its intended purpose and scope but I do know that it has been relatively inactive since I've been on it. What do some of it's early members (or moderator) feel about opening it up to a more basic discussion of Bourdieu? Or is better to start another list?

David Bartecchi

---

Do you Yahoo!?
The New Yahoo! Search - Faster. Easier. Bingo.