From: "Emrah Goker" <emrah_goker-AT-hotmail.com> Subject: [BOU:] Re: veiling and islam Date: Sun, 04 Jan 2004 16:54:31 -0500 Good thing my blurb provoked discussion. Bad thing the power of the western-civilizationist doxa made its presence felt even on this list so rapidly. It won't be admitted easily ("What me biased? My best friends are Muslim! The majority of Muslims are good!"), but read between the lines of a couple of messages sent, it is lurking there. I ally myself with Ozgur and Batoul and others who are sensitive about the injustices done towards North America's and Europe's Muslim immigrant communities, as well as about the racisms perpetuated at the very moment by the occupations of Iraq and Palestine. First, a couple of replies I felt urged to make: Erik -- I couldn't put a finger on the reason for your reactionarism, maybe it's your rhetorical style. First, dubbing the full-body veil as "ninja outfit" is common in the right-wing Turkish journalistic field (that includes fascist, Kemalist, neoliberal and other western-civilizationist positions), and well, for irreligious socialists like me, not to mention for most religious citizens, men or women, it is regarded as a racist obscenity. I can only hope that you tried to distance yourself from those positions with the quotation marks. Second, it would be useful to present some evidence for your other claims about the relation between class distinction and veiling, homesickness and veiling, non-integration and Islam, etc. Not that I am skeptical, I want to learn. As it stands, your imagination of Islam in Europe is misleading: as if all generations of Muslim immigrants believe that Europe is a battlefield and that they have to prepare themselves for a war. Now, this is Berlusconi's or Blair's or Bush's vision of Islam, true, but how sociological is it? Third, yes, oppression and inequality are properties of certain relations among Muslims. But the journalistic/scholastic argument used by right-wing French (or Turkish) Republicans to support discrimination against young Muslim women ("We are trying to liberate them from their male fundamentalist oppressors by removing their foluard/turban") is only an excuse for the state elites' nationalist/irredentist angst. Moreover, it is not difficult to detect the homology between this civilizing desire of "liberation" and the imperialist one (the latter's consequences are still unfolding in Afghanistan and Iraq). Sociologically, one needs to show, if they exist, the properly "Islamic" mechanisms of oppression whose removal will necessarily end racism, xenophobia, injustice and inequality in, say, France. In that vein, one needs to be clear about what an appropriate path for "integration" of a Muslim immigrant in a European country. [Interviews in Bourdieu et. al.'s "The Weight of the World" frequently expose the problems with the "integration of Arabs". Mahmood Mamdani further exposes the other fallacy of the western-civilizationist distinction between "good" and "bad" Muslims; see his "Good Muslim, Bad Muslim – An African Perspective", http://www.ssrc.org/sept11/essays/mamdani.htm] John -- You write: "Furthermore to say that secularism or laicism is a right wing movement is not ignorant; it is stupid." And in another message, you note that anti-laicist Muslims who are "trying to make inroads into the progressive institutions of the French state", are "in the minority of Islam, as the leader of the sunnite sect Friday approved France's position for muslims in France, arguing that the veil was mandatory in a muslim country but elsewhere one does as in Rome." I agree that "laicism" is not a movement, but in the case of especially France and Turkey, it is a dirigiste social technology, a source of political and bureaucratic capital, that can be used differently by different governments. In Turkey, as Ozgur also mentioned, the Army and left- or right-wing governments have mobilized this technology to undermine/control/oppress the representations of Islam which were beyond the state's reach. Like the Turkish Directorate of Religious Affairs, which is a state institution designed to discipline Islam and profess the official version, after 1960s the French Consultative Council of Muslim Communities was designed to establish a similar disciplining of the "unruly" Algerian Muslims. Like the cooperation between German governments and Turkish ones to empower "official Islam" against "fundamentalist Islam", the French governments also cooperated with Tunisian, Algerian and Moroccan governments for the management of religious services. It is not surprising that the domesticized leaders of Sunni communities will anxiously declare that they are "good" Muslims, that they want no trouble, and that they are willing to tolerate discrimination in order not to appear as a threat to France's "national security and unity". ... For me, defending young Muslim women's rights is a matter of justice. Forbidding veiling in schools, universities, public institutions, etc. constitutes an unjust treatment of a religious community. The ban enforces, in France, unjust majority communitarianism, which denies the equivalent treatment of young Muslim women in education. As far as I know, there is no analogous ban against Christian insignia. The principle of equal participation is denied here. Now, defenders of the foulard must also establish that permitting it will not exacerbate female subordination among the citizenship at large. As far as I know, there is no conclusive evidence that all diverse female Muslim representations of the veil are univocally subordinated to something called "Islamic patriarchy". The meanings are contested, and other than numerous testimonies like that of Batoul, there is a rich social scientific literature that supports this. [One among many examples, concerning the diverse representations in Turkey, is Nilufer Gole's book, "The Forbidden Modern".] Emrah _________________________________________________________________ Working moms: Find helpful tips here on managing kids, home, work — and yourself. http://special.msn.com/msnbc/workingmom.armx ********************************************************************** Contributions: bourdieu-AT-lists.village.virginia.edu Commands: majordomo-AT-lists.village.virginia.edu Requests: bourdieu-approval-AT-lists.village.virginia.edu
Display software: ArchTracker © Malgosia Askanas, 2000-2005