Date: Thu, 19 Jan 1995 22:56:46 -0600 (CST)
From: CND7750-AT-utarlg.uta.edu
Subject: RE: Miller's articl{


I agree that it is useless to argue against representaion, but
it is not useless to consider the way deleuze conceives repre-
sentation: as an effect of affect{.
This is central to all the stuff in _ATP_ about "not doing
history." IT is a theorectical point that Miller takes
objection to and in large part basis his arguement upon.q
I am not saying that this is not critiqable. But as 
Miller notes, given D&G's own rule{s it is not. I'm not
saying let them decide what the rules are, what i am
saying is that Deleuze's ontology pretty much determines
his positions on history, anthropology, and repr{sentation.
Yes i'm following the thread on seminar-10.{more later.

chris

     ------------------