Date: Mon, 18 Sep 1995 10:01:43 -0500 (CDT)
From: CND7750-AT-UTARLG.UTA.EDU
Subject: Re: Susan Says Here It Is, There It Isn't


I guess that means i am attempting to designate a set of prototypical
concepts in a way Deleuze does not. I won't get into semiotic
presuppositions because i really don't care, and i'm sure you do
not either. 

Your reading of Hegel seems very unhegelian. I can't imagine an 
Hegelian admitting that 'history' is worthless because the
nature/culture dualism is untenable. Obviously you are not much
of an Hegelian, just someone interested in the affects brought
to bear on bodies with the word 'Hegel', which is not unlike
my own interest in Hegel. Of course you could be harboring
a thinly veiled dualism like Lacan's, bullshit concerning
the symbolic and the real.

chris

     ------------------