From: WITKIEWICZ-AT-aol.com
Date: Wed, 17 Jul 1996 23:22:54 -0400
Subject: Re: theologic machine


In a message dated 96-07-17 19:08:47 EDT, you write:

<< Amen, Brother!
 >One will not find deleuzian theology in the abstract machines.  But a 
 >deleuzian God is not so distant and leibnizian as you suggest. the 
 >abstract machines are not created; they are not aggregates or 
 >assemblages of their parts, nor do they carry the code for such 
 >aggregation. God does not have a moment of monadic origin that seeks 
 >temporal reification. Rather, the theologic machine, the concept of 
 >difference Herself, marks the becoming of the entire (total as 
 >actual/infinate as virtual) plane of immanence and all of its 
 >heterological inscriptions (Adam & Eve).  the inscriptions and 
 >reinscriptions mark and caress an immense becoming that is both
 >incarnate and known as a causal result--not as history, but as 
 >manifestation: heirophany.  Thus, multiplicity constantly undoes 
 >itself(s) not "in spite of God" but because of God. 
 >   A Deleuzian theology is always a theology of immanence. 
 >
 >THIS IS WHY SPINOZA IS THE CHRIST
 >
 >---dominic
 >
 > >>

beautiful gobbeldy-gook