Date: Fri, 6 Sep 1996 17:20:16 +1000 (EST) From: Mr Christopher McMahon <Christopher.McMahon-AT-jcu.edu.au> Subject: Re: Chris' introduction Thanks for the tip, Andrew. On Wed, 28 Aug 1996, Steve.Devos wrote: > Hello > > Try also ATP - Plat 12 and Plat 13 > > > andrew favell wrote: > > > > Hi > > Try "What is philosophy?" by D&G as there are recurring themes about the > > State in that. > > > > >Hello. > > >My name is Chris McMahon. I'm a PhD student at jcu in Townsville, NQ, > > >Australia. Im working on Revenge and the State with special interest in > > >the positioning of gender(s): the subject used to be Women and Revenge. > > >The primary source texts are Elizabethan and > > >Jacobean Revenge dramas. I've read (and am very enthusiastic about) D&G > > >Antioedipus and ATP, as well as > > >Logic of Sense, and many of the chapters from Boundas' reader and "Gilles > > >Deleuze and the Theatre of Philosophy". Does anybody know of any Deleuzian > > >and/or Guattari texts which might be directly or indirectly relevant to my > > >thesis? As in any texts discussing English Renaissance drama specifically, > > >or any texts focussing on "the State", States, Urstaat(s) etc? > > > > > >PS. In many ways, the Urstaat seems to be presented as a > > >transcendental Idea, or Form of all contingent States: something that > > >contingent soci might be in the process of "perfecting" or "reinventing". > > >I suspect that this is wrong..... Does anybody have an opinion on this? If > > >the Urstaat is something look a "homologous form" (qua Tractatus) > > >underlying all States (and marking them off as States)? > > > > > >Any advice on this matter would be appreciated. > > > > > >Chris > > > > > > > > > > > >
Display software: ArchTracker © Malgosia Askanas, 2000-2005