Date: Wed, 23 Oct 1996 11:40:06 -0400 (EDT) From: "Greg J. Seigworth" <gseigwor-AT-marauder.millersv.edu> Subject: Re[3]: labor of dionysus On Wed, 23 Oct 1996, Tom Blancato wrote: > I'm not responding to everything you've written, and you've pointed to > some really interesting things, so I'll be thinking and filling out > interlibrary loan forms... You have some things in mind, it seems, which > perhaps you're not quite unpacking enough? Not nearly enough. I always tell myself never to jump into discussions on this list unless I can follow them through but, right now (and for the next couple of weeks), there's too much else on my plate so apologies, apologies, apologies in advance. To be honest, it might take two weeks to get my head around some of the issues you raise in this most recent post anyway. But, if you're filling out interlibrary loan cards, etc, then, my most immediate task--of seduction--as been fulfilled (if you don't have it, fill out a loan card for Dreyfuss and Rabinow's book on Foucault and sneak a peak at Foucault's afterword on "the subject and power; why study power: the question of the subject, how is power exercised?"). My most immediate reaction (beside much nodding in agreement) was to still be slightly puzzled over how you've interpreted F's work on power (on more than one occasion in Deleuze's _Foucault_, he'll say something like "For a long time Foucault ..." and, then, of course, after this 'long time' something changed and it may have very well have been Foucault's "encounter" [more than 'influence', Deleuze's _F_, p.129] with Heidegger that makes it possible to talk about Foucault after this long time elsewhere. And Deleuze says that it was "a final rediscovery of Heidegger by Foucault. Memory is contrasted not with forgetting but with the forgetting of forgetting [and here I always hear the Mekons singing in their song "Amnesia" about the subterranean histories of rock and roll: "I forgot to forgot to remember"], which dissolves us into the outside and constitutes death. On the other hand, as long as the outside is folded an inside is coextensive with it, a memory as coextensive as forgetting. It is this coextensive nature which is life, a long period of time . . . For a long time Foucault thought of the outside as being an ultimate spatiality that was deeper than time; but in his late works he offers the possibility once more of putting time on the outside and thinking of the outside as being time, conditioned by the fold" [p.108-109]. So I think that, in some respects, your accent on *forgetting* is right though it arrives in the midst of (and applies to) F's "long time elsewhere" and not necessarily to what follows. A bit later, Deleuze says, "All these determinations of thought were already original figures of the action of thought [what version of *thoughtaction* might be found here?]. And for a long time Foucault did not believe that thought could be anything else. How could thought invent a morality, since thought can find nothing outside itself except that outside from which it comes and which resides in it as 'the unthought'?" [p.118]. And what Foucault follows, instead, is the line (the same line that, I think, "concerns" you, Tom) of the outside and its folding into what Deleuze calls "zones of subjectivation." Now, this is all way tooooo truncated but what I'm trying to do--and probably not very well, I'm trying to move too quickly--is show points of connection between where you seem to be headed, Tom, and certain paths that Deleuze (and Guattari! -- yes, of course, his "Regimes, Pathways, Subjectivities" too: among others) and Foucault have journeyed. You're not quite saying the same thing but I'm grateful for that: it means you've got something to add and not just a tracing of their map. Boy, this is a long paranthetical moment. I'll stop) and, secondly, I'd want to pursue the issue of *moral condition* and morality (this is a kind of flipness that overtakes me and turns morality to molarity but, of course, it ain't quite so simple: just like bottom-up and top-down--one of the points in your post that I will absolutely say is most well-taken). Perhaps we can make a date for two or three weeks from now? Maybe maybe maybe. Though that should preclude no one else from piping-in in the meantime ... Greg, sometimes interior decorator
Display software: ArchTracker © Malgosia Askanas, 2000-2005