File spoon-archives/deleuze-guattari.archive/deleuze-guattari_1996/d-g_Jun.96, message 176


Date: Wed, 19 Jun 1996 11:03:48 -0400 (EDT)
From: Spoon Collective <spoons-AT-jefferson.village.Virginia.EDU>
Subject: Forwarded mail....




---------- Forwarded message ----------
Date: Tue, 18 Jun 1996 21:26:18 +0300
From: Mr Background <daemon-AT-phoenix.oulu.fi>

> From: gonsalv-AT-odyssee.net (Ronald Gonsalves)
> Subject: Narcsense
> 
> >Excremental oedipus is either life lived without intensity... or the
> residue of lives lived intensely.
> 
> yes yes my unconsciousness says yes yes yeshesaid yes
> instead of saying yes yes we shall find a way to oppress ourselves as I
> usually do when the question of desire and the social arises
> 
> Anti-Oedipus: "There is only desire and the social and nothing else"
> 
> Otherwise said: pragmatically your take on desir-comme-de-lire, a line of
> flight cutting across the social is right on, theoretically and politically
> there are problems
> 
> The prime problem is re-cuperation, re-appropriation, dissuasion, in short,
> reterritorialization. Capitalism, as we know, is an axiomatic that continues
> its reign by repelling its limits, using its limits as building blocks, as
> in the case of post-colonialism where the "liberation" of third world
> countries from direct Western control (a deterritorialization or threat to
> industrialized hegemony given the red overtones of some of these
> revolutions)is brought to order by the rise of multi-national corporations,
> technological-dependency, raw resource prod. as ghettoization etc...
> Another great ReTerritorialization turns upon the subject as a putative
> unity. Instead of flowing through the world-web, making heterogeneous
> connexions, unimaginable links, unexpected cuts, the individual's desire
> flows into organized channels, his or her love life becoming the sad history
> of controlled cathexes, caught amidst displacements and substitutes for ma
> and pa imago. In other words, from a theoretic standpoint (and I am
> interpellated into this role by "pulverized" power processes, just to give
> an example of the ineluctability of (in this case academic) power, the way
> it throws you into abysses of abstraction. Just when you think you are free
> you're in a tightly circumscribed subject position: the terror of "the
> subject supposed to know") the erotic couple (or triple or whatever) is a
> reterritorialization. Sexual decadance being the height of dissuasive
> distraction-fascination. Capitalism can easily accommadate a few crazies
> living out romance as a playing with death, as an "intimate theatre" of
> revolt, une vrai bataille as the French might say. The commodity-signs
> continue to circulate, the axiomatic continues to deduct quanta of dead
> labour. The axiomatic functions as smoothly as ever. Thus politically,
> erotic delirium can never be the way of an insurrectional micro-politics
> unless it becomes in some way communal (and on this point one would have to
> question the Reichian undercurrent of Anti-Oedipus, the mysteries of the
> organism, "sex-political practice" etc). But one can, and indeed must, slip
> away from the interpellations of the theorist and political activist (voices
> that speak from on high are they not?). Why must? Cuz we must live on must
> not we? A pragmatics of "libidinal values" as D&G say on one of the
> plateaus. Erotics is not unproblematic (the courtly love tradition living on
> in our bodies, for example, always hovers on the edge of an idealizing
> sublimationn due to its Christocentric roots) but it escapes power for the
> simple reason that it is not a petrified interpellated position. It is not a
> phallic voice that speaks from on high for it is a matter of dialogics...
> no that's not strong enough 
> polyglossalia
> heteroglossalia
> c'est une question de la langue
> "It is a matter of making an action out of a word by rendering it
> indecomposable, impossible to disintegrate: language without
> articulation...vocal outbursts in a continuous breath" (Deleuze on Artaud LS)
> 
> une parole soufflee 
> 
> Rodez Josh
> 
> 
>  
> 

Tunnus deleuze-guattari on lukittu koska Phoenix ja Zombie poistuvat
kaytosta. Koeta lahettaa postisi osoitteella :
deleuze-guattari-AT-raita.oulu.fi

Account deleuze-guattari is locked, since Phoenix and Zombie are being
prepared to get removed from use. Try to send your mail with address:
deleuze-guattari-AT-raita.oulu.fi



     ------------------

   

Driftline Main Page

 

Display software: ArchTracker © Malgosia Askanas, 2000-2005