Date: Thu, 6 Jun 1996 01:56:23 GMT
Subject: Sokal on the Net?
From: jya-AT-pipeline.com (John Young)


On Jun 05, 1996 16:13:30, 'Catherine Liu <liuxx-AT-GOLD.TC.UMN.EDU>' wrote: 
 
 
>I read Fish's and Ross's responses however. For the overworked and 
>undersubscribed, Sokal's piece should be posted on the Net. Does anyone 
>know if it is? 
 
 
I've seen this question on several lists, but not an answer. If Sokal's
article is not already on the Net, I'll put it on a Web site if there's
interest shown here or by E-mail to me. It'll only take a few hours of
public service. 
 
 
It's composed of 15 pages of main text, 12 pages of 55 detailed notes, and
10 pages of about 220 references citing the finest-minded thinkers and
kinky sexy-science tinkerers-malingerers of the era. 
 
 
You got to read all this to get the full impact. If you've already read all
of Sokal's references you've got to be intellectually surfeited
(mindfucked), due, as Catherine Liu accuses, to being underworked and
over-subscribed. 
 
 
John Young 
<jya-AT-pipeline.com> 
 
 

     ------------------