Date: Sun, 17 Mar 1996 05:12:50 -0600 (CST) From: Elizabeth Harrison <sybil-AT-csd.uwm.edu> Subject: Re: territorializations On Sat, 16 Mar 1996, andrew favell wrote: > On Sat. March 16, Patricia T. Srebrnik wrote: > > >Dear list members, sorry to ask such SIMPLE questions, but would > >anyone be willing to help me out by explaining briefly the > >concepts "deterritorialization," "reterritorialization," and > >"nomadism"?? > >THANKS! ~Patricia, notice how your post has been deterritorialized > > > Patricia, nothing simple about those questions. and reterritorialized on a new plane~ I think that answering those > questions adequately is to tap into the crux of the D&G idea of becoming. > However, I'm not sure if I personally can give a 'brief' explanation, but > what the heck ... I'll give it a go. To explore ideas of > 'territorialization' - that is re- and de-terr., consider this metaphor: > Take ice and melt it. > Nomadism refers then to this movement of territorializations for me nomad is what this d/gean stuff is all about witness the gentle tipping of the assemblage by poets, rappers, and trekkies > > This is what enables D&G to write of 'becoming-other', 'becoming-dog', etc. > Now I may have got it all confused, but this is my (mis)understanding of > these concepts for whatever its worth. becomingcrispinpiedpiper becomingflo > Have fun!! > and experiment~ > Andrew > Vancouver, BC > > sleeplessinmilwaukee sybil ------------------
Display software: ArchTracker © Malgosia Askanas, 2000-2005