From: H_FIGUEROA-AT-upr1.upr.clu.edu Date: Sat, 2 Mar 96 12:17 AST Subject: Re: nomads, cyborgs, personnes John said: The problem I find with cyborgs (as they've been discussed by Haraway et al) is that though they "blur categorical distinctions" they recognize and reinstate them in the act of blurring. Ok. The Cyborg as cultural metaphore can't trascend categorial distinctions, nor deny them but desestabilize dichotomous thinking. This means that we should situate the cyborg figure within complex discursive web that shows up dichotomies (and *asimetries* within categorical dichotomies, fale/female, human/machine, culture/nature...) as power effect constructions. In this sense the cyborg imaginary can be articulated to ryzomatic, as well as foucauldian- and even derridean - thinking. Heidi ------------------
Display software: ArchTracker © Malgosia Askanas, 2000-2005