Date: Sat, 21 Dec 1996 11:45:41 +0200
From: Vadim Linetski <picador-AT-luckynet.co.il>
Subject: p.s. to my answer to Brian &Liano re: res.to th.


14 MAY 97
Why not dot the i's and cross the t's?
from my definition of textual resistance it follows that Liano's view of
"shitting" as a continuous activity is self-contradictory: it proves ...
my own claims: if Orpheus's pieces are "shit", then they cannot be used,
i.e. resist PoMo theory and therefore are bound to be censored. Another
theoretical  defeat illustrating the ideas from my main message