Date: Sun, 28 Jun 1998 18:55:03 +0800 From: Paul Bains <P.Bains-AT-murdoch.edu.au> Subject: Re: dark precursor Hmm, "intereresting". I wonder what 'semiotic' Brian is thinking of. It's interesting that he is still playing with the 'topological turn' and a kind of abstract descriptive language that invokes no 'logic'. I'm not sure that what he's writing about can happen without a semiotic of 'relations'. have to ask him about this in sydney in a couple of wks. (I wonder when he thinks 'experience' was 'in us'.... Paul. At 11:08 PM 6/27/98 -0400, you wrote: >Anyway, Massumi writes about the analytical inadequacies of the semiotic >and phenemonological 'receiving ends' of experience in this essay and says >stuff like: >And, later, page 21: "Experience is no longer in us...Our existence is an ongoing topological transformation of a >complexifying abstract ontological surface: separation, foldback, >doubling, intersection, re-separation, fold-back over again, redoubling, >resection ... confound it."
Display software: ArchTracker © Malgosia Askanas, 2000-2005